Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) continues to demonstrate tremendous potential in improving the therapeutic gains in radiation therapy by specifically delivering radiation to tumors that can be well assessed in terms of dosimetry and imaging. Dosimetry in external beam radiation therapy is standard practice. This is not the case, however, in RPT. This NRG (acronym formed from the first letter of the 3 original groups: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group)-National Cancer Institute Working Group review describes some of the challenges to improving RPT. The main priorities for advancing the field include (1) developing and adopting best practice guidelines for incorporating patient-specific dosimetry for RPT that can be used at both large clinics with substantial resources and more modest clinics that have limited resources, (2) establishing and improving strategies for introducing new radiopharmaceuticals for clinical investigation, (3) developing approaches to address the radiophobia that is associated with the administration of radioactivity for cancer therapy, and (4) solving the financial and logistical issues of expertise and training in the developing field of RPT.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 905-912 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 15 2021 |
Funding
Disclosures: C.D. reports serving as an adviser/consultant to Janssen Inc, Invicro LLC, ReleXion Inc, and Tomopath Inc. E.C.F. reports other from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry, LLC (Rapid) during the conduct of the study and other from GE Health Care outside the submitted work. R.F.H. reports personal fees from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry, LLC (Rapid), outside the submitted work. In addition, R.F.H. has a patent 12/514,853 issued, a patent 12/687,670 issued, a patent 12/690,471 issued, and a patent 61/719,283 issued. R.M. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of OranoMed. Y.S. reports grants from the National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study. G.S. reports personal fees from Bayer, Inc, personal fees from Orano Med, other from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry (Rapid) outside the submitted work. In addition, G.S. has a patent US 9,387,344 B2, a patent US 8,693,629 B2, and a patent US 9,757,084 B2, all licensed to Rapid. Disclosures: C.D. reports serving as an adviser/consultant to Janssen Inc, Invicro LLC, ReleXion Inc, and Tomopath Inc. E.C.F. reports other from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry, LLC (Rapid) during the conduct of the study and other from GE Health Care outside the submitted work. R.F.H. reports personal fees from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry, LLC (Rapid), outside the submitted work. In addition, R.F.H. has a patent 12/514,853 issued, a patent 12/687,670 issued, a patent 12/690,471 issued, and a patent 61/719,283 issued. R.M. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of OranoMed. Y.S. reports grants from the National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study. G.S. reports personal fees from Bayer, Inc, personal fees from Orano Med, other from Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry (Rapid) outside the submitted work. In addition, G.S. has a patent US 9,387,344 B2, a patent US 8,693,629 B2, and a patent US 9,757,084 B2, all licensed to Rapid.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry | 8,693,629 B2 |
Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Dosimetry, LLC | |
Tomopath Inc. | |
National Cancer Institute | UG1CA233290 |
National Cancer Institute |