TY - JOUR
T1 - On the heating mix of ITER
AU - Wagner, F.
AU - Becoulet, A.
AU - Budny, R.
AU - Erckmann, V.
AU - Farina, D.
AU - Giruzzi, G.
AU - Kamada, Y.
AU - Kaye, A.
AU - Koech, F.
AU - Lackner, K.
AU - Marushchenko, N.
AU - Murakami, M.
AU - Oikawa, T.
AU - Parail, V.
AU - Park, J. M.
AU - Ramponi, G.
AU - Sauter, O.
AU - Stork, D.
AU - Thomas, P. R.
AU - Tran, Q. M.
AU - Ward, D.
AU - Zohm, H.
AU - Zucca, C.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - This paper considers the heating mix of ITER for the two main scenarios. Presently, 73MWof absorbed power are foreseen in the mix 20/33/20 for ECH, NBI and ICH. Given a sufficient edge stability, Q = 10-the goal of scenario 2-can be reached with 40MW power irrespective of the heating method but depends sensitively inter alia on the H-mode pedestal temperature, the density profile shape and on the characteristics of impurity transport. ICH preferentially heats the ions and would contribute specifically with ΔQ < 1.5. The success of the Q = 5 steady-state scenario 4 with reduced current requires discharges with improved confinement necessitating weakly or strongly reversed shear, fbs > 0.5, and strong off-axis current drive (CD). The findings presented here are based on revised CD efficiencies γ for ECCD and a detailed benchmark of several CD codes. With ECCD alone, the goals of scenario 4 can hardly be reached. Efficient off-axisCDis only possible with NBI.With beams, inductive discharges with fni > 0.8 can be maintained for 3000 s. The conclusion of this study is that the present heating mix of ITER is appropriate. It provides the necessary actuators to induce in a flexible way the best possible scenarios. The development risks of NBI at 1MeV can be reduced by operation at 0.85MeV.
AB - This paper considers the heating mix of ITER for the two main scenarios. Presently, 73MWof absorbed power are foreseen in the mix 20/33/20 for ECH, NBI and ICH. Given a sufficient edge stability, Q = 10-the goal of scenario 2-can be reached with 40MW power irrespective of the heating method but depends sensitively inter alia on the H-mode pedestal temperature, the density profile shape and on the characteristics of impurity transport. ICH preferentially heats the ions and would contribute specifically with ΔQ < 1.5. The success of the Q = 5 steady-state scenario 4 with reduced current requires discharges with improved confinement necessitating weakly or strongly reversed shear, fbs > 0.5, and strong off-axis current drive (CD). The findings presented here are based on revised CD efficiencies γ for ECCD and a detailed benchmark of several CD codes. With ECCD alone, the goals of scenario 4 can hardly be reached. Efficient off-axisCDis only possible with NBI.With beams, inductive discharges with fni > 0.8 can be maintained for 3000 s. The conclusion of this study is that the present heating mix of ITER is appropriate. It provides the necessary actuators to induce in a flexible way the best possible scenarios. The development risks of NBI at 1MeV can be reduced by operation at 0.85MeV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650030228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124044
DO - 10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78650030228
SN - 0741-3335
VL - 52
JO - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
JF - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
IS - 12
M1 - 124044
ER -