Obsidian diffusion dating by secondary ion mass spectrometry: A test using results from Mound 65, Chalco, Mexico

Lee R. Riciputi, J. Michael Elam, Lawrence M. Anovitz, David R. Cole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) was used to measure hydrogen and other elemental concentrations as a function of depth in ten obsidian artifacts (Pachuca Source), each with a well-constrained 14C date, from Mound 65, Chalco, Mexico. Hydrogen depth profiles for the different artifacts all display a characteristic S-shape, and increasing maximum hydrogen content in each profile and profile depths are well correlated with time. These data are used to investigate the potential use of Obsidian Diffusion Dating by SIMS (ODDSIMS) for both extrinsic and intrinsic dating of obsidian artifacts. Using "characteristic points" on the hydrogen profile (half-fall depth, inflection point depth), simple hydration rate equations were evaluated against time constraints provided by associated 14C dates. We demonstrate that neither the traditional OHD equation for depth (x) as a function of the square root of time (t1/2) nor a linear function (t1) fit the data. Solving the more generalized tn function provides an excellent fit between characteristic point depths and 14C dates (for n ≈ 0.75), and meets the constraint that at time equal to zero, the depth of the hydration profile must also be zero. However, this may be an average coefficient over the range of ages available, and may not accurately reflect rates at shorter or longer times. Using only two obsidian samples and their associated 14C dates, a calibration curve can be derived that provides ODDSIMS dates for the other pieces that are in excellent agreement with associated 14C dates, indicating that empirical application of the technique is potentially feasible, at least at individual sites. The underlying processes governing hydrogen transport into the obsidian were also investigated by using finite difference modelling to reproduce the shape of the hydrogen depth profile. Excellent fits were obtained by assuming concentration-dependent diffusion, and dates that agree well with associated 14C dates can also be extracted from the finite difference profiles. Although considerable additional work needs to be done, the success of the finite difference modelling suggests that development of an independent, intrinsic ODDSIMS model may be possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1055-1075
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2002

Funding

Research sponsored by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle LLC, and by National Science Foundation grant SBR-98-04350 and BCS-0108956 to the University of Tennessee. We also thank the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (INAH), especially Ing. Joaquin Garcia-Barcena, Presidente de Consejo de Arqueologia, INAH for his advice and assistance. We thank Richard Klein and two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the late Dr Mary Hodge who provided the Chalco obsidian sample set. Her careful work, both in the field and in the lab, made the analysis presented here possible. It is to her memory that we dedicate this report.

FundersFunder number
Office of Basic Energy Sciences
UT-Battelle LLC
National Science FoundationSBR-98-04350, BCS-0108956
U.S. Department of EnergyDE-AC05-00OR22725
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
University of Tennessee
Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division

    Keywords

    • Chalco
    • Depth-profile
    • Diffusion
    • Glass
    • Hydration
    • Mound 65
    • Obsidian
    • Oddsims

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Obsidian diffusion dating by secondary ion mass spectrometry: A test using results from Mound 65, Chalco, Mexico'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this