Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in an ombrotrophic peatland: a benchmark for assessing change

Verity G. Salmon, Deanne J. Brice, Scott Bridgham, Joanne Childs, Jake Graham, Natalie A. Griffiths, Kirsten Hofmockel, Colleen M. Iversen, Terri M. Jicha, Randy K. Kolka, Joel E. Kostka, Avni Malhotra, Richard J. Norby, Jana R. Phillips, Daniel Ricciuto, Christopher W. Schadt, Stephen D. Sebestyen, Xiaoying Shi, Anthony P. Walker, Jeffrey M. WarrenDavid J. Weston, Xiaojuan Yang, Paul J. Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: Slow decomposition and isolation from groundwater mean that ombrotrophic peatlands store a large amount of soil carbon (C) but have low availability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). To better understand the role these limiting nutrients play in determining the C balance of peatland ecosystems, we compile comprehensive N and P budgets for a forested bog in northern Minnesota, USA. Methods: N and P within plants, soils, and water are quantified based on field measurements. The resulting empirical dataset are then compared to modern-day, site-level simulations from the peatland land surface version of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (ELM-SPRUCE). Results: Our results reveal N is accumulating in the ecosystem at 0.2 ± 0.1 g N m−2 year−1 but annual P inputs to this ecosystem are balanced by losses. Biomass stoichiometry indicates that plant functional types differ in N versus P limitation, with trees exhibiting a stronger N limitation than ericaceous shrubs or Sphagnum moss. High biomass and productivity of Sphagnum results in the moss layer storing and cycling a large proportion of plant N and P. Comparing our empirically-derived nutrient budgets to ELM-SPRUCE shows the model captures N cycling within dominant plant functional types well. Conclusions: The nutrient budgets and stoichiometry presented serve as a baseline for quantifying the nutrient cycling response of peatland ecosystems to both observed and simulated climate change. Our analysis improves our understanding of N and P dynamics within nutrient-limited peatlands and represents a crucial step toward improving C-cycle projections into the twenty-first century.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-674
Number of pages26
JournalPlant and Soil
Volume466
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Funding

We would like to thank Robert Nettles, Kyle Pearson, Ryan Heiderman, Leslie A. Hook, Holly Vander Stel, Anna Jensen, Eric Ward, Keith Oleheiser, Anne Gapinski, Mitchell Olds, Madeline Wiley, Leigh Kastenson, Reid Peterson, Ben Munson, Anna Hall, Dustin Woodruff and Stan D. Wullschleger for helping with field data collection and lab work. The authors from ORNL are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-1008 00OR22725. The USDA Forest Service funded contributions of SDS and RKK in support of the SPRUCE Experiment. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1754756) to JEK. Nathan Armistead (ORNL) helped conceptualize and construct Figure . This manuscript was significantly improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers and Tim Moore (McGill University). We would like to thank Robert Nettles, Kyle Pearson, Ryan Heiderman, Leslie A. Hook, Holly Vander Stel, Anna Jensen, Eric Ward, Keith Oleheiser, Anne Gapinski, Mitchell Olds, Madeline Wiley, Leigh Kastenson, Reid Peterson, Ben Munson, Anna Hall, Dustin Woodruff and Stan D. Wullschleger for helping with field data collection and lab work. The authors from ORNL are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-1008 00OR22725. The USDA Forest Service funded contributions of SDS and RKK in support of the SPRUCE Experiment. This?work was supported in part by a grant?from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1754756) to JEK. Nathan Armistead (ORNL) helped conceptualize and construct Figure 1. This manuscript was significantly improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers and Tim Moore (McGill University). This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ). This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ).

FundersFunder number
DOE Public Access Plan
National Science FoundationDEB 1754756
U.S. Department of EnergyDE-AC05-1008 00OR22725
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Office of Science
Biological and Environmental Research
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
McGill UniversityDE-AC05-00OR22725

    Keywords

    • Belowground
    • Peat
    • Peatland
    • Picea mariana
    • Sphagnum
    • Stoichiometry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in an ombrotrophic peatland: a benchmark for assessing change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this