Neutron scattering study of underdoped Ba 1-xK xFe 2As 2 (x=0.09 and 0.17) self-flux-grown single crystals and the universality of the tricritical point

  • C. R. Rotundu
  • , W. Tian
  • , K. C. Rule
  • , T. R. Forrest
  • , J. Zhao
  • , J. L. Zarestky
  • , R. J. Birgeneau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present a combination of elastic neutron scattering measurements in zero and 14.5 T and magnetization measurements in zero and 14 T on underdoped superconducting Ba 1-xK xFe 2As 2 (x=0.17), and the same measurements in zero field on a nonsuperconducting crystal with x=0.09. The data suggest that the underdoped materials may not be electronic phase separated but rather have slightly inhomogeneous potassium doping. The temperature dependence of the magnetic order parameter below the transition of the sample with x=0.09 is more gradual than that for the case of the undoped BaFe 2As 2, suggesting that this doping may be in the vicinity of a tricritical point. We advance therefore the hypothesis that the tricritical point is a common feature of all superconducting 122s. For the x=0.17 sample, while T c is suppressed from ∼17 to ∼8 K by a magnetic field of 14 T, the intensity of the magnetic Bragg peaks (1 0 3) at 1.2 K is enhanced by 10%, showing competition of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism. The intensity of the magnetic Bragg peaks (1 0 3) in the (T c, T N) temperature interval remain practically unchanged in 14.5 T within a 10% statistical error. The present results are discussed in the context of the existing literature.

Original languageEnglish
Article number144506
JournalPhysical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
Volume85
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 4 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neutron scattering study of underdoped Ba 1-xK xFe 2As 2 (x=0.09 and 0.17) self-flux-grown single crystals and the universality of the tricritical point'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this