Abstract
Coupling particle and reactor scale models is as essential as reactor fluid dynamics and particle motion for accurate Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulations of biomass fast pyrolysis reactors due to intraparticle heat transfer and chemical reactions controlling conversion time and product distributions. Direct online coupling of a particle model with a reactor model is computationally expensive, while offline coupling is case-dependent. In this research, solutions from a series of particle pyrolysis simulations were regressed with Artificial Neural Network (ANN). This machine learning-derived model predicted the same temperature and conversion profiles compared with particle resolved simulation while the isothermal approach overpredicted the temperature by 130 K and underpredicted the conversion time by 30 s. The ANN model was then integrated into CFD simulations of fluidized bed biomass fast pyrolysis with varied feedstocks via coupling PyTorch and MFiX. The averaged error of simulation predicted bio-oil yields with four feedstocks is 6.4%. This multi-scale approach provides an efficient tool for the coupled particle and reactor scale simulations of biomass pyrolysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 133853 |
Journal | Chemical Engineering Journal |
Volume | 431 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2022 |
Funding
This project was funded by the United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, in part, through a site support contract. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor the support contractor, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This research was conducted as part of the Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium (FCIC) funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO). This work was also supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technology Office under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. The authors would like to thank Dr. Debiagi for helpful discussions on pyrolysis kinetics. Dr. Gao would like to acknowledge the partial support from the 2021 Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Special Fund (“Grant Project + Task List”) Project ( 210729096900340 ). This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium | |
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technology Office | |
U.S. Department of Energy | DE-AC36-08GO28308 |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory | |
Bioenergy Technologies Office | |
National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Keywords
- Biomass pyrolysis
- Fluidized bed
- Intra-particle model
- Machine learning
- Multiscale CFD
- Pyrolysis kinetics