Abstract
Mechanistic photosynthesis models are at the heart of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) simulating the daily, monthly, annual and decadal rhythms of carbon assimilation (A). These models are founded on robust mathematical hypotheses that describe how A responds to changes in light and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Two predominant photosynthesis models are in common usage: Farquhar (FvCB) and Collatz (CBGB). However, a detailed quantitative comparison of these two models has never been undertaken. In this study, we unify the FvCB and CBGB models to a common parameter set and use novel multi-hypothesis methods (that account for both hypothesis and parameter variability) for process-level sensitivity analysis. These models represent three key biological processes: carboxylation, electron transport, triose phosphate use (TPU) and an additional model process: limiting-rate selection. Each of the four processes comprises 1–3 alternative hypotheses giving 12 possible individual models with a total of 14 parameters. To broaden inference, TBM simulations were run and novel, high-resolution photosynthesis measurements were made. We show that parameters associated with carboxylation are the most influential parameters but also reveal the surprising and marked dominance of the limiting-rate selection process (accounting for 57% of the variation in A vs. 22% for carboxylation). The limiting-rate selection assumption proposed by CBGB smooths the transition between limiting rates and always reduces A below the minimum of all potentially limiting rates, by up to 25%, effectively imposing a fourth limitation on A. Evaluation of the CBGB smoothing function in three TBMs demonstrated a reduction in global A by 4%–10%, equivalent to 50%–160% of current annual fossil fuel emissions. This analysis reveals a surprising and previously unquantified influence of a process that has been integral to many TBMs for decades, highlighting the value of multi-hypothesis methods.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 804-822 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Global Change Biology |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2021 |
Funding
This research was supported as part of the ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science SFA and Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments‐Tropics, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research and under U.S. DOE contract numbers DE‐AC05‐00OR22725 to Oak Ridge National Laboratory and DE‐SC0012704 to Brookhaven National Laboratory. MY was supported by U.S. DOE grant DE‐SC0019438 and NSF‐EAR grant 1552329. RF acknowledges the support of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. This research was supported as part of the ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science SFA and Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments-Tropics, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research and under U.S. DOE contract numbers DE-AC05-00OR22725 to Oak Ridge National Laboratory and DE-SC0012704 to Brookhaven National Laboratory. MY was supported by U.S. DOE grant DE-SC0019438 and NSF-EAR grant 1552329. RF acknowledges the support of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NSF-EAR | |
NSF‐EAR | 1552329 |
Office of Biological and Environmental Research | DE-AC05-00OR22725 |
National Science Foundation | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Directorate for Geosciences | 1852977 |
National Center for Atmospheric Research | |
Office of Science | |
Biological and Environmental Research | DE‐SC0012704, DE‐AC05‐00OR22725, DE‐SC0019438 |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | DE-SC0012704, DE-SC0019438 |
Keywords
- carbon assimilation
- high-resolution A–C curve
- multi-hypothesis modelling
- photosynthesis
- process sensitivity analysis
- terrestrial biosphere model