Abstract
The thermal resistivity (h·ft2·°F/Btu/in.) of closed-cell rigid foam insulation materials significantly decreases over time. Diffusion-tight facers are designed to significantly enhance initial thermal resistivity and long-term thermal performance by preventing gas diffusion into the foam cells and inhibiting the escape of low thermal conductivity blowing agents. In addition to the gas diffusion property of the facer film, adhesion between the foam and the facer is crucial for achieving diffusion-tight bonding. This study addresses the challenge of thermal aging by investigating how facer film properties and foam formulation influence the durability of thermal performance. A systematic evaluation was conducted to understand the effects of polymeric barrier films, surface treatments, facer coverage, and foam matrix rigidity on thermal resistivity over time. Key findings reveal that diffusion-tight facers, particularly those with metallized layers and compatible heat seal layers, significantly reduce gas exchange and improve foam-facer adhesion. The optimized system, incorporating barrier facers and a tailored polyisocyanurate foam formulation, achieved initial and aged thermal resistivity values after 200 days of approximately 8.3 and 7.4 h ft2·°F/Btu/in., respectively representing only a 10 % reduction compared to a 17 % reduction observed in control samples without facers. Notably, polyurethane spray foams with facers exhibited only a 4 % reduction in thermal resistivity, compared to a 23 % decrease in control samples, demonstrating nearly six times better retention of thermal performance. This innovative facer technology presents a promising solution for reducing energy costs and represents a significant advancement in optimizing energy management for building envelopes in future technologies. This technology can also be adapted for other applications that necessitate the preservation of long-term thermal performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 115198 |
| Journal | Journal of Building Engineering |
| Volume | 119 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2026 |
Funding
The research described in this paper was sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office . We would like to thank DOE for its funding support and companies FLEXcon, FLEXfilm, Kevothermal, Hanita Coatings, GAF Materials, BASF , The Chemours Company , Milliken & Company, Stepan Company, and Evonik Industries for providing the samples used in this study. Additionally, we are grateful to Kevin Pollack, Kevin McGrath, and Ken Willoughby at GAF Materials for their valuable guidance and support throughout the research. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ).