Microstructural characterization of the as-cast and annealed Pu-10Zr alloy

Assel Aitkaliyeva, Cynthia A. Adkins, Jacob Hirschhorn, Casey McKinney, Michael R. Tonks, Fidelma Giulia Di Lemma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Phase diagrams constructed for the Pu-Zr binary system report the existence of θ-(Pu,Zr), δ-(Pu,Zr), γ-Pu, α-Pu, β-Pu, and ζ-Pu28Zr phases in Pu-enriched region, when Pu concentrations exceed 75 at.% (equivalent to 89 wt% Pu). The compound θ-(Pu,Zr) has been said to occur at about 20 at.% Zr, but the regions for θ-(Pu,Zr) on the Pu-rich side have not been well defined. In an effort to understand the phases formed in Pu-Zr binary alloys and define the boundary between θ-(Pu,Zr), (θ+δ), and δ-(Pu,Zr) regions, Pu-10Zr (in wt.%, equivalent 23 at.%) alloys were scrutinized in this contribution. This manuscript details microstructural characterization and phase identification results obtained using electron microscopy-based techniques for a Pu-10Zr alloy before and after annealing at 550 °C. In contradiction with predicted phase diagrams, no θ-(Pu,Zr) was detected in any of the examined specimens. The phases present in as-cast fuel included a δ-(Pu,Zr) matrix with a number of smaller, randomly distributed α-Zr, ZrO2, Zr3O, PuO, and κ-PuZr2 inclusions. Heat treatment annealed out the intermetallic κ-PuZr2 phase and resulted in formation of small δ′-Pu and β-Pu inclusions. Similar to the as-cast alloys, the matrix of the annealed alloys was consistent with δ-(Pu,Zr) phase and contained small α-Zr, ZrO2, and PuO2 inclusions. Two different microscopy-based techniques were used for phase identification, but neither identified any θ-(Pu,Zr) phase. Differential scanning calorimetry was then used to determine the phase transition temperatures and enthalpies of transition for the identified phases. While our data is similar to the existing phase diagrams, a number of discrepancies are reported that call for a careful re-examination of the Pu-Zr system. This contribution discusses different scenarios that could explain the discrepancies between obtained and historical data, and provides the most logical conclusion that could be reached based on the obtained results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-90
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Nuclear Materials
Volume523
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 , as part of Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) program of the US DOE and INL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. The EBSD data collection and analysis was supported as part of a Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) project. Fidelma Di Lemma would like to acknowledge NSUF scientist program funds, James Madden, and Daniel Murray for the help with EBSD data acquisition. Authors would like to acknowledge the staff of Fuel Manufacturing Facility (FMF), Electron Microscopy Laboratory (EML), and Analytical Laboratory at the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) at Idaho National Laboratory and Materials Characterization Suite (MaCS) at the Center of Advanced Energy Studies (CAES) for their effort in fabrication, handling, and transfer of the alloys used in this work.

FundersFunder number
Fuel Cycle Research and Development
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Nuclear EnergyDE-AC07-05ID14517
Laboratory Directed Research and Development

    Keywords

    • Metallic fuel
    • Microstructure
    • Phase identification
    • Phase transition temperatures
    • Plutonium-zirconium

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Microstructural characterization of the as-cast and annealed Pu-10Zr alloy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this