Abstract
Recent years have seen a substantial increase in the application of machine learning (ML) for automated analysis of nondestructive examination (NDE) data. One of the applications of interest is the use of ML for the analysis of data from in-service inspection of welds in nuclear power and other industries. These types of inspections are performed in accordance with criteria described in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and require the use of reliable NDE techniques. The rapid growth in ML methods and the diversity of possible approaches indicate a need to assess the current capabilities of ML and automated data analysis for NDE and identify any gaps or shortcomings in current ML technologies as applied to the automated analysis of NDE data. In particular, there is a need to determine the impact of ML on the NDE reliability. This paper discusses the findings from a literature survey on the current state of ML for the automated analysis of data from ultrasonic NDE of weld flaws. It discusses an overview of ultrasonic NDE as used for weld inspections in nuclear power and other industries. Data sets and ML models used in the literature are summarized, along with a generally applicable workflow for ML. Findings on the capabilities, limitations and potential gaps in feature selection, data selection, and ML model optimization are discussed. The paper identified several needs for quantifying and validating the performance of ML methods for ultrasonic NDE, including the need for common data sets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 106854 |
Journal | Ultrasonics |
Volume | 127 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2023 |
Funding
Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).This work was supported by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Research (RES) under Contract 31310019N0001, Task Order 31310020F0038 (Carol Nove, NRC Contracting Officer Representative). This work was supported by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Research (RES) under Contract 31310019N0001 , Task Order 31310020F0038 (Carol Nove, NRC Contracting Officer Representative). Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC , under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
DOE Public Access Plan | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |
National Research Council | 31310019N0001, 31310020F0038 |
Keywords
- Machine learning
- Model performance
- Nondestructive examination
- Ultrasound
- Welding defect