Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: [A comparative study]

Ranga Raju Vatsavai, Chandola Varun, Anil Cheriyadat, Eddie Bright, Bhaduri Budhendra, Jordan Grasser

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCOM.Geo 2011 - 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Applications
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Event2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Applications, COM.Geo 2011 - Washington, DC, United States
Duration: May 23 2011May 25 2011

Publication series

NameACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Conference

Conference2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Applications, COM.Geo 2011
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityWashington, DC
Period05/23/1105/25/11

Keywords

  • Bayesian classification
  • MCS
  • Neural networks
  • Trees

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: [A comparative study]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this