Loss performance of an additively manufactured axial flux machine stator with an eddy-current limiting structure

Alexander D. Goodall, F. N.U. Nishanth, Eric L. Severson, Iain Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

AC electrical machines have mostly been limited to 2D magnetic circuits due to the use of electrical-steel laminations, however, in recent years advances in non-traditional motor architectures such as axial flux show promise for increased torque and power densities. 3D magnetic circuits as required by axial flux motors are difficult to manufacture using laminations, and for other architectures impossible. Soft magnetic composites enable 3D flux pathways but at the expense of magnetic properties. In this study, an axial flux stator is fabricated from high-silicon electrical steel (Fe-6.5 wt%Si) using additive manufacturing with Hilbert cross-sectional geometry to limit eddy current losses and compared with electrical steel laminations of 0.127 mm and 0.35 mm. This shows comparable performance between the additively manufactured Hilbert stator and 0.35 mm laminations below 500 Hz. A torque loss of approximately 20% was observed due to 34% less magnetic material in the Hilbert stator than 0.127 mm laminations, but improved torque density for the stator by 13%. By designing for additive manufacturing, tooth area could be scaled up providing an electrical machine with 3D magnetic flux pathways with acceptable loss behaviour and good magnetic circuit properties, enabling further flexibility to electrical engineers in their pursuit of higher torque and power density.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105978
JournalMaterials Today Communications
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We wish to acknowledge the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials, funded through EPSRC grants EP/R00661X/1 , EP/S019367/1 , EP/P02470X/1 and EP/P025285/1 , for access to the AconityMINI and AconityLab at The University of Sheffield. We also wish to acknowledge Prof. Geraint Jewell for support in the design and manufacture of the demonstrator motor, and for access and support to the AMH-1 K Permeameter. The authors are grateful to the Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium (WEMPEC) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for providing access to the electric machine prototype testing facilities. Electromagnetic simulation tools used in this study at the University of Wisconsin-Madison were generously provided by Mentor Graphics, a Siemens business. We wish to acknowledge the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials, funded through EPSRC grants EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P02470X/1 and EP/P025285/1, for access to the AconityMINI and AconityLab at The University of Sheffield. We also wish to acknowledge Prof. Geraint Jewell for support in the design and manufacture of the demonstrator motor, and for access and support to the AMH-1 K Permeameter. The authors are grateful to the Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium (WEMPEC) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for providing access to the electric machine prototype testing facilities. Electromagnetic simulation tools used in this study at the University of Wisconsin-Madison were generously provided by Mentor Graphics, a Siemens business.

FundersFunder number
Henry Royce Institute
Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEP/S019367/1, EP/P02470X/1, EP/P025285/1, EP/R00661X/1
University of Sheffield

    Keywords

    • Additive manufacturing
    • Axial flux machine
    • Eddy currents
    • Electric machines
    • Soft magnetic material

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Loss performance of an additively manufactured axial flux machine stator with an eddy-current limiting structure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this