Iodine solid sorbent design: a literature review of the critical criteria for consideration

Brian J. Riley, Joshua R. Turner, Joanna McFarlane, Saehwa Chong, Krista Carlson, Josef Matyáš

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Designing sorbents for iodine capture in different conditions requires selection and optimization of a large and diverse range of variables. These variables fall into general categories (or features) of sorbent activity, sorbent stability, and the fate of the loaded material in terms of the disposal (waste form) options available. To illustrate, silver-loaded, high-porosity sorbents make for maximized iodine capture and less pressure drop in a column-based sorption system approach, however, this high porosity can lead to less mechanically stable sorbents. Additionally, waste forms containing silver must also be compliant with additional criteria for hazardous waste disposal. Thus, all these aspects must be considered simultaneously when selecting a sorbent for utilization under specific conditions. Information is given for different types of sorbent design considerations for different operating conditions and some emphasis is also given on promising alternatives for silver as the active (chemisorption-based) getter metal. Discussion is given around demonstrated options for waste forms for different metal-iodide compounds.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMaterials Advances
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Funding

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. PNNL and ORNL contributions were funded through the United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's (DOE-NE) Material Recovery and Waste Form Development Campaign under the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain (NFCSC) Program. PNNL and ORNL authors thank Kimberly Gray (DOE-NE) and Ken Marsden (Idaho National Laboratory) for programmatic support. KC's contributions to this effort were supported by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) under contract DE-NE0009317, and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) under contract 31310022M015. BR thanks Sheila Riley for her help in editing the document.

FundersFunder number
Office of Nuclear Energy
Battelle
U.S. Department of EnergyDE-AC05-76RL01830
U.S. Department of Energy
NFCSCDE-NE0009317
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission31310022M015
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Iodine solid sorbent design: a literature review of the critical criteria for consideration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this