Abstract
Silicon anodes suffer from an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer that contributes to undesirable capacity fade with cycling. A key part to addressing this unstable SEI formation is to examine how certain components of the SEI react with the electrolyte over time. One SEI component that has not been thoroughly studied in the context of the chemical reactivity against the electrolyte is lithiated silicate. Four model silicate thin films with increasing lithium content were deposited by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering to study how the lithiation of the native oxide on a silicon anode affects the chemical stability of the anode surface. SiO2, Li2Si2O5, Li2SiO3, and Li3SiOx films were exposed to 1.2 M LiPF6 in the 3:7 wt % ethylene carbonate/ethyl methyl carbonate (EC/EMC) electrolyte for periods of time that are representative of the amount of time it takes to undergo cell formations. Soaked samples were rinsed, dried, and characterized by a combination of attenuated total reflectance-infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), focused ion beam-secondary electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling. It was found that the rate of the decrease in film thickness of the silicates exposed to the electrolyte over time increases as a function of the lithium content in the thin film. This reaction involves HF etching and LiPF6 salt degradation leading to silicate loss and fluorination throughout the bulk. Understanding this chemical instability is critical to determining the overall mechanism of SEI degradation over time.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 8153-8161 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Physical Chemistry C |
Volume | 124 |
Issue number | 15 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 16 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 American Chemical Society.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories. This work was authored in part by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the manager and operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. 2020. The research is supported by the Vehicle Technology Office of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, under the supervision of Brian Cunningham. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy | |
U.S. Department of Energy | 2020 |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory | |
Sandia National Laboratories | |
Laboratory Directed Research and Development |