Abstract
An intercomparison of the radio-chronometric ages of four distinct plutonium-certified reference materials varying in chemical form, isotopic composition, and period of production are presented. The cross-comparison of the different 234U/238Pu, 235U/239Pu, 236U/240Pu, and 241Am/241Pu model purification ages obtained at four independent analytical facilities covering a range of laboratory environments from bulk sample processing to clean facilities dedicated to nuclear forensic investigation of environmental samples enables a true assessment of the state-of-practice in "age dating capabilities" for nuclear materials. The analytical techniques evaluated used modern mass spectrometer instrumentation including thermal ionization mass spectrometers and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers for isotopic abundance measurements. Both multicollector and single collector instruments were utilized to generate the data presented here. Consensus values established in this study make it possible to use these isotopic standards as quality control standards for radio-chronometry applications. Results highlight the need for plutonium isotopic standards that are certified for 234U/238Pu, 235U/239Pu, 236U/240Pu, and 241Am/241Pu model purification ages as well as other multigenerational radio-chronometers such as 237Np/241Pu. Due to the capabilities of modern analytical instrumentation, analytical laboratories that focus on trace level analyses can obtain model ages with marginally larger uncertainties than laboratories that handle bulk samples. When isotope ratio measurement techniques like thermal ionization mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with comparable precision are utilized, model purification ages with similar uncertainties are obtained.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 11643-11652 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Analytical Chemistry |
Volume | 91 |
Issue number | 18 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 17 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
Support for this study came from the Office of Nuclear Controls, NA-242, Confidence Building Measures Program and NA-213 Nuclear Smuggling Detection and Deterrence. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNLJRNL-765551-DRAFT). Pete Mason (NBL Program Office) is thanked for the NBL-RM-2010-Pu-History report. This work is approved for unlimited release under LA-UR-19-23330. The JRC-KRU Analytical Service is kindly acknowledged. Support for this study came from the Office of Nuclear Controls, NA-242, Confidence Building Measures Program and NA-213 Nuclear Smuggling Detection and Deterrence. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNL-JRNL-765551-DRAFT). Pete Mason (NBL Program Office) is thanked for the NBL-RM-2010-Pu-History report. This work is approved for unlimited release under LA-UR-19-23330. The JRC-KRU Analytical Service is kindly acknowledged.