Interactions among decaying leaf litter, root litter and soil organic matter vary with mycorrhizal type

Luke M. Jacobs, Benjamin N. Sulman, Edward R. Brzostek, John J. Feighery, Richard P. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Root-derived inputs are increasingly viewed as primary controls of soil organic matter (SOM) formation; however, we have a limited understanding of how root decay rates depend on soil factors, and how decaying roots influence the breakdown of leaf litter and SOM. We incubated root and leaf litter (alone and in combination) from arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees in soils collected from forest plots dominated by AM and ECM trees in a factorial design. In each microcosm, we quantified litter decay rates and the effects of decaying litters on soil C balance. We hypothesized that (1) AM root litters would decompose faster than ECM root litters, (2) root litter decay would be greatest when decomposed in “home” soils (e.g. AM litters in AM soils and ECM litters in ECM soils) and (3) root and leaf litters would decompose faster when decaying in the same microcosms than when decaying in separate microcosms, resulting in the largest CO2 losses. Overall, AM root litter decomposed faster than ECM root litter, and the magnitude of this effect depended on soil origin. AM litters decayed fastest in AM soils, but ECM and mixed AM–ECM litters were unaffected by soil origin. Decaying roots increased leaf litter mass loss, but only in microcosms containing soils of the same origin (e.g. AM litters in AM soils; mixed litters in mixed soils). Carbon losses were dominated by microbial respiration, and the magnitude of this flux depended on litter type and soil origin. When leaves and roots decayed together, respiratory losses exceeded those from microcosms containing leaves and roots alone, with the largest losses occurring in each litters' “home” soil. In AM soils, elevated losses were driven by roots accelerating leaf decay, while in ECM soils, elevated losses resulted from roots and leaves accelerating the decay of SOM; in mixed soils, root-induced increases in leaf and SOM decay contributed to elevated C losses. Synthesis. Our results suggest that root, leaf and SOM decay are intertwined, and that measurements of these processes in isolation may lead to incorrect estimates of the magnitude and source of C losses from soils.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-513
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Ecology
Volume106
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We would like to thank members of the Phillips laboratory who provided critical feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank Wes Beaulieu for his assistance with the statistical analysis (through the Indiana Statistical Consulting Center) and Marc-Andre Giasson for his advice on the DOC analyses. We are grateful for logistical support that we received from the staff at IU’s Research and Teaching Preserve and from Kim Novick, who allowed us to set up the microcosms in her laboratory space. Erica C. Raeber is tanked for her assistance assembling the microcosms and experimental frame. Finally, we would like to thank Karina Clemmensen (special feature editor) and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback, and Jack Brookshire, Luke McCormack and Nina Wurzberger—organizers of the oral symposium “Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers and modulators of ecosystem processes” at the Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting in Ft Lauderdale, FL. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Department of Environmental Biology, Ecosystem Studies (Grant #1153401) and the Department of Energy’s Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program. We would like to thank members of the Phillips laboratory who provided critical feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank Wes Beaulieu for his assistance with the statistical analysis (through the Indiana Statistical Consulting Center) and Marc-Andre Giasson for his advice on the DOC analyses. We are grateful for logistical support that we received from the staff at IU's Research and Teaching Preserve and from Kim Novick, who allowed us to set up the microcosms in her laboratory space. Erica C. Raeber is tanked for her assistance assembling the microcosms and experimental frame. Finally, we would like to thank Karina Clemmensen (special feature editor) and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback, and Jack Brookshire, Luke McCormack and Nina Wurzberger—organizers of the oral symposium “Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers and modulators of ecosystem processes” at the Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting in Ft Lauderdale, FL. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Department of Environmental Biology, Ecosystem Studies (Grant #1153401) and the Department of Energy's Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program.

FundersFunder number
Department of Environmental Biology
National Science Foundation
U.S. Department of Energy
Directorate for Biological Sciences1153401
Biological and Environmental Research

    Keywords

    • ecosystem carbon storage
    • home-field advantage
    • mycorrhizal association
    • plant–soil interactions
    • priming effects
    • root turnover

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Interactions among decaying leaf litter, root litter and soil organic matter vary with mycorrhizal type'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this