Interaction of beryllium with 316H stainless steel in molten Li2BeF4 (FLiBe)

James R. Keiser, Preet M. Singh, Michael J. Lance, Harry M. Meyer, Kristian G. Myhre, Tracie M. Lowe, Dino Sulejmanovic, Ercan Cakmak, Victoria A. Cox, C. Shane Hawkins, Adam W. Willoughby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The increased demand in renewable energy resources has led to a renewed interest in nuclear reactors including a new generation of molten salt reactors. One of the issues encountered in handling of molten chloride or fluoride salts is the inability of metals to form and retain a protective oxide surface layer, generally chromium oxide. The low chromium content, nickel-based alloy INOR-8, later marketed as Hastelloy N, was specifically developed to contain molten fluorides. This alloy had some deficiencies, but its composition resulted in it incurring far less chromium depletion by the molten fluoride salts than alloys like 316 stainless steel. For the next generation of molten salt reactors, an alloy with pressure vessel code approval and higher temperature capability than Hastelloy N is required. Consequently, several reactor designers have reportedly chosen to build the reactor containment vessel from 316H stainless steel. In order to minimize corrosion of the stainless steel by the molten fluoride salt (2LiF-BeF2), it is proposed to add beryllium metal to the salt to react with impurities and provide a means to lower the oxidation potential thus making the salt less corrosive. However, there is a concern whether the beryllium would react with components of the stainless steel. To address this concern, static capsule tests were conducted in which selected amounts of beryllium were added to capsules containing 2LiF-BeF2 (FLiBe) salt and 316H stainless steel and Hastelloy N samples. Following exposure, the samples were cleaned and examined using a variety of analysis techniques including, optical microscopy, SEM-EDS, XPS, LIBS, XRD and EPMA. Tensile samples were also exposed in capsules, and those were subjected to tensile testing. It was found that for the level of beryllium additions used in this study, intermetallic compounds were formed which could be detrimental to the long-term performance of the 316H stainless steel.

Original languageEnglish
Article number153698
JournalJournal of Nuclear Materials
Volume565
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

Funding

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan. ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ). The contributions of reviewers Jiheon (Jay) Jun, Cody Parker and Bruce Pint are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) under award DE-NE0008749. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interaction of beryllium with 316H stainless steel in molten Li2BeF4 (FLiBe)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this