Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrated geological, economic, and risk assessment of underground hydrogen storage

  • Prakash Purswani
  • , K. C. Bijay
  • , Hyeonseok Lee
  • , Yun Yang
  • , Uwaila C. Iyare
  • , Lawrence O. Baompong
  • , Shaowen Mao
  • , David Z. Li
  • , Zhidi Wu
  • , Manjeet Chhetri
  • , Siqin Yu
  • , Xiaoyu Zhang
  • , Ruyi Zheng
  • , Chelsea W. Neil
  • , Qinjun Kang
  • , Wenfeng Li
  • , Neala M. Creasy
  • , Eric J. Guiltinan
  • , Wen Zhao
  • , Mohamed Mehana
  • Luke P. Frash, Amber E. Zandanel, Jeffrey D. Hyman, Gaoxue Wang, Robert P. Currier, Daniel P. Leonard, Siddharth Komini Babu, Rose J. Adams, Isaac D. Mantelli, George B. Perkins, Marlena J. Rock, Stuart D. Ware, Timothy C. Germann, Michael R. Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is a promising option to buffer variable renewable power and support the hydrogen economy. Yet this technology is early-stage, and key uncertainties remain about how coupled processes such as geochemical and geomechanical impacts affect long-term storage security. In this paper, we seek to integrate the results from a large, multi-scale research program to quantify core feasibility metrics and situate these studies within ongoing efforts. Through this work, we evaluate hydrogen recoverability during storage by assessing diffusive losses, losses to geochemical interactions and their subsequent impact on geomechanical properties, and losses to residual saturation during injection and withdrawal. Molecular and laboratory studies show that lithologic heterogeneity, pore geometry, and mineral surface chemistry govern hydrogen–rock interactions, controlling loss pathways. High-pressure coreflooding is used to estimate relative permeabilities and measure parameters needed for reservoir-scale sensitivity analyses. These core-scale experiments found early hydrogen breakthrough at low saturations driven by capillary and viscous fingering, which limits pore-space utilization at early times, while repeated injection and withdrawal cycles improve deliverability over time. Technoeconomic factors and purity requirements for end uses are also considered as part of our comprehensive feasibility analysis. Finally, we underscore the importance of geophysical monitoring and tailored injection strategies to maintain integrity and efficiency. Together, these results provide a quantitative foundation for safe, scalable deployment of UHS and highlight priorities for future integrated studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number138930
JournalFuel
Volume420
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2026

Funding

The research presented in this article is supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program of Los Alamos National Laboratory under project numbers 20230022DR, 20240509MFR, 20230411MFR, and 20240860PRD2 and has been designated with the Los Alamos Unlimited Release number LA-UR-25-29990. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. 89233218CNA000001). The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government.

Keywords

  • Caprock integrity
  • Feasibility study
  • Geochemical andgeomechanical coupling
  • Hydrogen diffusion
  • Microbial hydrogen consumption
  • Technoeconomic analysis
  • Underground hydrogen storage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated geological, economic, and risk assessment of underground hydrogen storage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this