TY - GEN
T1 - Institutionalizing safeguards by design for nuclear facilities
AU - Morgan, Jim
AU - Kovacic, Don
AU - Whitaker, Michael
AU - Bjornard, Trond
AU - DeMuth, Scott
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Safeguards for nuclear facilities could be significantly improved by developing and implementing methods of integrating proliferation resistance into the design of new facilities. This paper proposes a method to systematically analyze a facility's processes, systems, equipment, structures and management controls to ensure that all relevant proliferation scenarios that could potentially result in unacceptable consequences have been identified, evaluated and mitigated. This approach could be institutionalized in a country's regulatory structure similarly to the way facilities are licensed to operate safely and are monitored through inspections and incident reporting to ensure compliance with domestic and international safeguards. Furthermore, taking credit for existing systems and equipment that have been analyzed and approved for ensuring the reliable safe operation of nuclear facilities would reduce the overall cost of implementing intrinsic and extrinsic proliferation-resistant features. The ultimate goal is to integrate safety, reliability, security and safeguards operations into the design of new facilities to effectively and efficiently prevent diversion, theft and misuse of nuclear material and sensitive technologies at both the facility and state levels. To facilitate this approach at the facility level, this paper discusses an integrated proliferation resistance analysis process. If effectively implemented, this integrated approach will also facilitate the application of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards.
AB - Safeguards for nuclear facilities could be significantly improved by developing and implementing methods of integrating proliferation resistance into the design of new facilities. This paper proposes a method to systematically analyze a facility's processes, systems, equipment, structures and management controls to ensure that all relevant proliferation scenarios that could potentially result in unacceptable consequences have been identified, evaluated and mitigated. This approach could be institutionalized in a country's regulatory structure similarly to the way facilities are licensed to operate safely and are monitored through inspections and incident reporting to ensure compliance with domestic and international safeguards. Furthermore, taking credit for existing systems and equipment that have been analyzed and approved for ensuring the reliable safe operation of nuclear facilities would reduce the overall cost of implementing intrinsic and extrinsic proliferation-resistant features. The ultimate goal is to integrate safety, reliability, security and safeguards operations into the design of new facilities to effectively and efficiently prevent diversion, theft and misuse of nuclear material and sensitive technologies at both the facility and state levels. To facilitate this approach at the facility level, this paper discusses an integrated proliferation resistance analysis process. If effectively implemented, this integrated approach will also facilitate the application of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards.
KW - Institutionalizing
KW - Proliferation resistance
KW - Safeguards by design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449814701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70449814701
SN - 9781615670154
SN - 9781615670154
T3 - 8th International Conference on Facility Operations: Safeguards Interface 2008
SP - 221
EP - 229
BT - 8th International Conference on Facility Operations
T2 - 8th International Conference on Facility Operations: Safeguards Interface 2008
Y2 - 30 March 2008 through 4 April 2008
ER -