Initial results from safety testing of US AGR-2 irradiation test fuel

Robert N. Morris, John D. Hunn, Charles A. Baldwin, Fred C. Montgomery, Tyler J. Gerczak, Paul A. Demkowicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two cylindrical compacts containing tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particles with kernels that contained a mixture of uranium carbide and uranium oxide (UCO) and two compacts with UO2-kernel TRISO particles have undergone 1600 °C safety testing. These compacts were irradiated in the US Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program's second irradiation test (AGR-2). The time-dependent releases of several radioisotopes (110mAg, 134Cs, 137Cs, 154Eu, 155Eu, 90Sr, and 85Kr) were monitored while heating the fuel specimens to 1600 °C in flowing helium for 300 h. The UCO compacts behaved similarly to previously reported 1600 °C-safety-tested UCO compacts from the AGR-1 irradiation. No failed TRISO or failed SiC were detected (based on krypton and cesium release), and cesium release through intact SiC was very low. Release behavior of silver, europium, and strontium appeared to be dominated by inventory originally released through intact coating layers during irradiation but retained in the compact matrix until it was released during safety testing. Both UO2 compacts exhibited cesium release from multiple particles whose SiC failed during the safety test. Europium and strontium release from these two UO2 compacts appeared to be dominated by release from the particles with failed SiC. Silver release was characteristically like the release from the UCO compacts in that an initial release of the majority of silver trapped in the matrix occurred during ramping to 1600 °C. However, additional silver release was observed later in the safety testing due to the UO2 TRISO with failed SiC. Failure of the SiC layer in the UO2 fuel appears to have been dominated by CO corrosion, as opposed to the palladium degradation observed in AGR-1 UCO fuel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-133
Number of pages10
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume329
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy , Office of Nuclear Energy , through the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Reactor Technologies Technology Development Office as part of the Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program. Analysis of leach solutions and CCCTF furnace components was provided by the ORNL Nuclear Analytical Chemistry & Isotopics Laboratory. Hot cell activities were supported by the staff of the ORNL Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratory. This work was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, through the Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Reactor Technologies Technology Development Office as part of the Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program. Analysis of leach solutions and CCCTF furnace components was provided by the ORNL Nuclear Analytical Chemistry & Isotopics Laboratory. Hot cell activities were supported by the staff of the ORNL Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratory.

FundersFunder number
Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program
Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Reactor Technologies Technology Development Office
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Nuclear Energy
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Keywords

    • Cesium release
    • High-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) fuel
    • Post-irradiation examination (PIE)
    • Safety testing
    • SiC failure
    • Tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) particles

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Initial results from safety testing of US AGR-2 irradiation test fuel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this