TY - GEN
T1 - Initial evaluation of standardized canisters in the waste management system
AU - Jarrell, Joshua J.
AU - Joseph, Robert A.
AU - Fortner, Jeffrey A.
AU - Hale, Richard E.
AU - Howard, Rob L.
AU - Kalinina, Elena A.
AU - Petersen, Gordon M.
AU - Wilkerson, Robert B.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Development and deployment of a standardized canister system represents an opportunity to develop an integrated approach to address storage, transportation, and disposal issues in the waste management system. However, this deployment has the potential for significant system-wide impacts regardless of timing and method of deployment. This evaluation compares continued loading of dual-purpose canisters (i.e., status quo) with loading of standardized canister systems in the near-term, before repository requirements are known and/or before operating reactors shut down. This evaluation quantitatively compares order of magnitude costs and logistics for different standardization scenarios with status quo scenarios, provides insight into quantifiable impacts of loading standardized canister systems in the near term, tests system-level analysis tools and associated input, and identifies scenarios for further analysis. Data used for at-reactor and repackaging operations must be updated to provide more realism at the system level. Based on the assumption that the cost to load any canister regardless of capacity was the same, loading the smallest (four pressurized water reactor [PWR] assemblies) canisters at reactors was the most expensive, most challenging option. Total system costs of loading either the medium (twelve PWR assemblies) or the large (twenty-one PWR assemblies) standardized canister systems before the waste-package capacity is determined are similar to the continued loading of current DPCs, though where those costs occur does change.
AB - Development and deployment of a standardized canister system represents an opportunity to develop an integrated approach to address storage, transportation, and disposal issues in the waste management system. However, this deployment has the potential for significant system-wide impacts regardless of timing and method of deployment. This evaluation compares continued loading of dual-purpose canisters (i.e., status quo) with loading of standardized canister systems in the near-term, before repository requirements are known and/or before operating reactors shut down. This evaluation quantitatively compares order of magnitude costs and logistics for different standardization scenarios with status quo scenarios, provides insight into quantifiable impacts of loading standardized canister systems in the near term, tests system-level analysis tools and associated input, and identifies scenarios for further analysis. Data used for at-reactor and repackaging operations must be updated to provide more realism at the system level. Based on the assumption that the cost to load any canister regardless of capacity was the same, loading the smallest (four pressurized water reactor [PWR] assemblies) canisters at reactors was the most expensive, most challenging option. Total system costs of loading either the medium (twelve PWR assemblies) or the large (twenty-one PWR assemblies) standardized canister systems before the waste-package capacity is determined are similar to the continued loading of current DPCs, though where those costs occur does change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945312818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84945312818
T3 - 15th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference 2015, IHLRWM 2015
SP - 143
EP - 149
BT - 15th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference 2015, IHLRWM 2015
PB - American Nuclear Society
T2 - 15th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, IHLRWM 2015
Y2 - 12 April 2015 through 16 April 2015
ER -