Abstract
The capability of four infrared thermometry techniques (2-colour and 1-colour pyrometers, Pyrolaser and IR camera) was evaluated with respect to the impact of water or steam in the line of sight to determine temperature from two heat sources (blackbody calibration source and steel block inside the furnace). The influence of liquid water on the temperature readings was minimal when using 2-colour pyrometry due to comparable absorption coefficients of water for the measured wavelengths. The signals measured using both the Pyrolaser and the 1-colour pyrometer were decreased due to the partial absorption and resulted in an apparent temperature lower than the actual. Water readily absorbed the IR signal in the range of the IR camera operation, resulting in no signal whenever liquid water was present in the line of sight. Steam caused the most deviation and fluctuation of temperature readings for all techniques due to the large level of light scattering in addition to the absorption of the radiant energy. A technique was developed to determine the transmissivity (apparent emissivity) when water or steam is in the line of sight of measurement. An approximate correction to the measurements based on Planck’s law is discussed for both 2-colour and 1-colour pyrometers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 123-141 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2023 |
Funding
This work was funded by the U.S. DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s (EERE) Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO). The authors would like to express their appreciation to ORNL colleagues such as Beth Armstrong for allowing access to her equipment to troubleshoot the experiments, Gregory Cox and Daniel Moore for their help in performing the experiments involving the industrial box furnace and Dr. S. Suresh Babu for the valuable discussions on materials processing. The authors also thank Scott Nagle from Process Sensors Corp. and Stefan Buschmann from Sensortherm GmbH for the helpful discussions on the 2-color pyrometer. Research was sponsored by the U. S. DOE, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle LLC. This work was funded by the U.S. DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s (EERE) Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO). The authors would like to express their appreciation to ORNL colleagues such as Beth Armstrong for allowing access to her equipment to troubleshoot the experiments, Gregory Cox and Daniel Moore for their help in performing the experiments involving the industrial box furnace and Dr. S. Suresh Babu for the valuable discussions on materials processing. The authors also thank Scott Nagle from Process Sensors Corp. and Stefan Buschmann from Sensortherm GmbH for the helpful discussions on the 2-color pyrometer.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Process Sensors Corp. | |
U. S. DOE | |
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Advanced Manufacturing Office | DE-AC05-00OR22725 |
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy | |
UT-Battelle |
Keywords
- 2-colour and 1-colour pyrometry
- blackbody
- infrared (IR) camera
- pyrolaser
- water and steam interference