Influence of fatigue precracking and specimen size on Master Curve fracture toughness measurements of EUROFER97 and F82H steels

Xiang (Frank) Chen, Marta Serrano, Rebeca Hernández, Dan Lu, Mikhail A. Sokolov, Sehila M. Gonzalez De Vicente, Yutai Katoh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

EUROFER97 and F82H steels are two leading reduced-activation ferritic-martensitic (RAFM) steels for fusion first wall and blanket applications. Exposure to the harsh environment of fusion reactors can result in severe degradation of fracture toughness. Thus, the post-irradiation evaluation of fracture toughness is critical for understanding the material behavior. Due to the space constraints of irradiation facilities and challenges in controlling a uniform irradiation condition for large size specimens, the development of small specimen test techniques (SSTT) is indispensable to evaluate the performance of irradiated materials. In this study, we evaluated specimen size effects on the Master Curve fracture toughness of EUROFER97 and F82H steels. A wide variety of specimens, including 0.5 T compact tension (C(T)) specimens, 0.16 T mini-compact tension (miniC(T)) specimens, and 1.65 mm miniature bend bar specimens, were tested. The testing methodology was based on the Master Curve method in the ASTM E1921 standard. No specimen size effect was observed in 0.5 T C(T) and 0.16 T miniC(T) specimens on the Master Curve reference temperature T0, while 1.65 mm miniature bend bar specimens yielded a higher T0Q. A strong effect of fatigue precracking on T0 for 0.5 T C(T) and 0.16 T miniC(T) specimens was observed, such that testing on specimens with skewed fatigue precrack fronts resulted in lower T0 than for specimens with ASTM standard qualified straight fatigue precrack fronts. The results highlight the importance of experimental quality control in developing SSTT for Master Curve fracture toughness testing. Lastly, we also evaluated and provided recommendations on the minimum number of specimens needed for each specimen type for yielding reliable T0Q values.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101393
JournalNuclear Materials and Energy
Volume34
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Funding

This research at ORNL was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC. The research at CIEMAT was sponsored by EUROFusion Consortium agreement and the Euratom research and training program under grant No 633053. We also appreciate the support from the IAEA CRP F13017 “Towards the Standardization of Small Specimen Test Techniques for Fusion Applications”. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The raw materials used in this study, EUROFER97 Batch-3 and F82H-BA12, were provided by Fusion for Energy (F4E) and National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), respectively. This research at ORNL was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC. The research at CIEMAT was sponsored by EUROFusion Consortium agreement and the Euratom research and training program under grant No 633053. We also appreciate the support from the IAEA CRP F13017 “Towards the Standardization of Small Specimen Test Techniques for Fusion Applications”. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The raw materials used in this study, EUROFER97 Batch-3 and F82H-BA12, were provided by Fusion for Energy (F4E) and National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), respectively. We appreciate contributions from the following personnel at ORNL: Eric Manneschmidt and Jordan Reed for performing fracture toughness testing; Doug Stringfield for facilitating specimen machining. Lastly, we would like to thank Tim Graening and TS Byun, also from ORNL, for their thoughtful review of this manuscript. Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (https://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

Keywords

  • Fracture toughness
  • Fusion
  • Master curve
  • Reduced activation ferritic-martensitic steel
  • Small specimen test techniques
  • Specimen size effects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of fatigue precracking and specimen size on Master Curve fracture toughness measurements of EUROFER97 and F82H steels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this