Inferred inflow forecast horizons guiding reservoir release decisions across the United States

Sean W.D. Turner, Wenwei Xu, Nathalie Voisin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Medium-to long-range forecasts often guide reservoir release decisions to support water management objectives, including mitigating flood and drought risks. While there is a burgeoning field of science targeted at improving forecast products and associated decision support models, data describing how and when forecasts are applied in practice remain undeveloped. This lack of knowledge may prevent hydrological modelers from developing accurate reservoir release schemes for large-scale, distributed hydrology models that are increasingly used to assess the vulnerabilities of large regions to hydrological stress. We address this issue by estimating seasonally varying, regulated inflow forecast horizons used in the operations of more than 300 dams throughout the conterminous United States (CONUS). For each dam, we take actual forward observed inflows (perfect foresight) as a proxy for forecasted flows available to the operator and then identify for each week of the year the forward horizon that best explains the release decisions taken. Resulting "horizon curves" specify for each dam the inferred inflow forecast horizon as a function of the week of the water year. These curves are analyzed for strength of evidence for contribution of medium-to long-range forecasts in decision making. We use random forest classification to estimate that approximately 80% of large dams and reservoirs in the US (1553±50 out of 1927 dams with at least 10Mm3 storage capacity) adopt medium-to long-range inflow forecasts to inform release decisions during at least part of the water year. Long-range forecast horizons (more than 6 weeks ahead) are detected in the operations of reservoirs located in high-elevation regions of the western US, where snowpack information likely guides the release. A simulation exercise conducted on four key western US reservoirs indicates that forecast-informed models of reservoir operations may outperform models that neglect the horizon curve-including during flood and drought conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1275-1291
Number of pages17
JournalHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 19 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Acknowledgements. This research was supported by the US Department of Energy Office of Science as part of the Integrated Mul-tiscale, Multisector Modeling project (grant no. 59534). This work was authored by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, managed by Battelle (contract no. DE-AC05-76RL01830) for the US Department of Energy (DOE). We thank Andy Wood (NCAR), Jeff Arnold (USACE), Ken Nowak (USBR), and Levi Brekke (USBR) for helpful insights and discussion. We also thank Charles Rougé and one anonymous referee for constructive suggestions that improved the paper significantly. Financial support. This research has been supported by the US De-

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inferred inflow forecast horizons guiding reservoir release decisions across the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this