Increased leaf area index and efficiency drive enhanced production under elevated atmospheric [CO2] in a pine-dominated stand showing no progressive nitrogen limitation

S. Palmroth, D. Kim, C. A. Maier, D. Medvigy, A. P. Walker, R. Oren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Enhancement of net primary production (NPP) in forests as atmospheric [CO2] increases is likely limited by the availability of other growth resources. The Duke Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment was located on a moderate-fertility site in the southeastern US, in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation with broadleaved species growing mostly in mid-canopy and understory. Duke FACE ran from 1994 to 2010 and combined elevated [CO2] (eCO2) with nitrogen (N) additions. We assessed the spatial and temporal variation of NPP response using a dataset that includes previously unpublished data from 6 years of the replicated CO2 × N experiment and extends to 2 years beyond the termination of enrichment. Averaged over time (1997–2010), NPP of pine and broadleaved species were 38% and 52% higher under eCO2 compared to ambient conditions. Furthermore, there was no evidence of a decline in enhancement over time in any plot regardless of its native site quality. The relation between spatial variation in the response and native site quality was suggested but inconclusive. Nitrogen amendments under eCO2, in turn, resulted in an additional 11% increase in pine NPP. For pine, the eCO2-induced increase in NPP was similar above- and belowground and was driven by both increased leaf area index (L) and production efficiency (PE = NPP/L). For broadleaved species, coarse-root biomass production was more than 200% higher under eCO2 and accounted for the entire production response, driven by increased PE. Notably, the fraction of annual NPP retained in total living biomass was higher under eCO2, reflecting a slight shift in allocation fraction to woody mass and a lower mortality rate. Our findings also imply that tree growth may not have been only N-limited, but perhaps constrained by the availability of other nutrients. The observed sustained NPP enhancement, even without N-additions, demonstrates no progressive N limitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere17190
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Funding

Duke Forest FACE project was operated by the Brookhaven National Laboratory and supported by the Office of Science, Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program, US Department of Energy. Support for Palmroth and Oren was provided by the ACCC Flagship–University of Helsinki, funded by the Academy of Finland (grant 337549). We thank Forest Service employees Karen Sarsony, Pete Anderson, Lance Kress, Robert Eaton, and Tom Christensen for technical assistance. ORNL is managed by UT‐Battelle, LLC, for the DOE under contract DE‐AC05‐1008 00OR22725. Duke Forest FACE project was operated by the Brookhaven National Laboratory and supported by the Office of Science, Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program, US Department of Energy. Support for Palmroth and Oren was provided by the ACCC Flagship–University of Helsinki, funded by the Academy of Finland (grant 337549). We thank Forest Service employees Karen Sarsony, Pete Anderson, Lance Kress, Robert Eaton, and Tom Christensen for technical assistance. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-1008 00OR22725.

FundersFunder number
ACCC Flagship–University of Helsinki
U.S. Department of EnergyDE‐AC05‐1008 00OR22725
Office of Science
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
U.S. Forest Service
Academy of Finland337549

    Keywords

    • FACE
    • Pinus taeda
    • biomass
    • broadleaved species
    • free air carbon dioxide enrichment
    • loblolly pine
    • net primary production
    • site quality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Increased leaf area index and efficiency drive enhanced production under elevated atmospheric [CO2] in a pine-dominated stand showing no progressive nitrogen limitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this