In tube condensation heat transfer and pressure drop for R454B and R32—Potential replacements for R410A ☆

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) industry in the United States seeks near-term alternative refrigerants to replace R-410A in unitary equipment. Two potential replacement refrigerants are R-454B and R-32. It is of interest to investigate the capability and accuracy of existing heat exchanger design methods when applied to these replacement refrigerants. To that end, this work presents empirical condensation quasi-local heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop data for R-454B and R-32. These data were obtained in a [Formula presented] in. (9.52 mm) outside diameter (OD) smooth copper tube with a wall thickness of 0.032 in. (0.81 mm). The experimental variables and their ranges included refrigerant absolute pressure (1960≤Pabs≤3196 kPa), condensation temperature (35≤Tcond≤50 oC), mass flux (100≤G≤200 kg m-2 s-1), vapor quality (0≤x≤1), and heat flux (32.9≤q≤62.97 kW m-2). It was found that the heat transfer correlation developed by Cavallini et al. Cavallini et al. (2006) predicted the experimental condensation heat transfer data, for both R-454B and R-32, with the greatest accuracy. Using the Cavallini et al. correlation, it was found that the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 10.5% and 15.1% for R-454B and R-32, respectively. Additionally, the pressure drop correlation developed by Friedel Friedel (1979) predicted the experimentally determined pressure gradient with a MAPE of 7.7% and 5.5% for R-454B and R-32, respectively. These results will assist the practicing thermal engineer to choose the most appropriate design correlation for these near-term replacement refrigerants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-253
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Refrigeration
Volume144
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Funding

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Tabeel Jacob in designing the experimental test facility. Additionally, the support provided by Brian Goins, Anthony Gehl, Jeff Taylor, Brent Massey, and Micheal Day during the construction of the test bench is greatly appreciated. Finally, the authors wish to acknowledge the funding provided by United States Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office (BTO).

Keywords

  • Condensation
  • Heat transfer coefficient
  • Pressure drop
  • R-32
  • R-410A
  • R-454B

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In tube condensation heat transfer and pressure drop for R454B and R32—Potential replacements for R410A ☆'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this