Abstract
The future of nuclear energy in the energy mix faces a permanent scrutiny of safety aspects in conciliation with bridled costs, either fission- or fusion-based. This affects to all the exciting milestones pursued in XXIst. To name few in the field of fission, the deployment of the IVth generation reactors is expected or the definitive solution to the radioactive wastes is sought. A mention apart is made to fusion technology, with ITER as the flagship project. It seeks a virtually infinite energy source, intrinsically safe and with reduced radioactive waste production with respect to fission the first commercial reactor. All these, and many other endeavors, share the operation of sophisticated devices in the presence of intense ionizing radiation fields. Humans and electronics must be protected to ensure safe and reliable performance, while shielding normally represents a large fraction of the budget. This involves nuclear analysis in the design phase to forecast the radiation conditions. The complexity of the simulation of 3D radiation fields that is computationally affordable nowadays is unprecedented. While sophistication in geometries and source definitions has become routine, the resulting complexity of these scalar fields makes their analysis increasingly difficult. The need of enhancement of the analysis techniques is evident today. Vector calculus is proposed following a physical interpretation of the field lines that boosts the analysis capabilities. It identifies the trajectories around which shielding is weakest in an automated errorless and effortless approach. Its power is illustrated with an example relevant to the ITER reactor.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 11904-11915 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | International Journal of Energy Research |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 25 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
We thank J. P. Catalan and F. Ogando for illuminating discussions. We also thank N. Casal and Y. Le Tonqueze for providing a frame to illustrate the vector analysis power. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training program 2014‐2018 and 2019‐2020 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. We appreciate the support given by: (i) MINECO for the funding of Juan de la Cierva‐incorporación program 2016; and the funding under I+D+i‐Retos Investigación, Project ENE2015‐70733R, (ii) Comunidad de Madrid under I+D en Tecnologías, Prj. TECHNOFUSIÓN (III)‐CM, S2018/EMT‐4437, (iii) ETS Ingenieros Industriales‐UNED 2019 programme and (iv) UNED for the funding of the predoctoral contract (FPI). We thank J. P. Catalan and F. Ogando for illuminating discussions. We also thank N. Casal and Y. Le Tonqueze for providing a frame to illustrate the vector analysis power. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training program 2014-2018 and 2019-2020 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. We appreciate the support given by: (i) MINECO for the funding of Juan de la Cierva-incorporaci?n program 2016; and the funding under I+D+i-Retos Investigaci?n, Project ENE2015-70733R, (ii) Comunidad de Madrid under I+D en Tecnolog?as, Prj. TECHNOFUSI?N (III)-CM, S2018/EMT-4437, (iii) ETS Ingenieros Industriales-UNED 2019 programme and (iv) UNED for the funding of the predoctoral contract (FPI).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Euratom research and training program 2014-2018 | |
I+D en Tecnolog?as | S2018/EMT-4437 |
I+D en Tecnologías | |
H2020 Euratom | 633053 |
Comunidad de Madrid | |
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | ENE2015-70733R |
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia |
Keywords
- ITER
- nuclear analysis
- nuclear fusion
- radiation shielding