Abstract
Shallow bore ground heat exchangers have been investigated in recent years because they have the potential to reduce the initial cost of the ground source heat pump system. Correctly modeling the transient heat transfer between the ground heat exchanger and the surrounding soil is essential for predicting a ground heat exchanger's performance. Simplification of the soil model could increase computation speed but sacrifice accuracy. This study investigates the impact of the soil model complexity on the annual performance prediction of a new shallow bore ground heat exchanger, the underground thermal battery (UTB). A simple 1D soil model and a more detailed 2D soil model were implemented, and they were validated against a 3D soil model. The resulting predictions of the UTB’s response from the 1D and 2D models to a given thermal load in different climates were compared. The results show that the root mean square differences between the hourly temperatures of the UTB during a year predicted using the two soil models range from 1.17 °C to 3.39 °C. As a result, the difference in the annual power consumption of the heat pump was between 0.7% and 3.4%. Furthermore, the dimensions of the UTB affected its performance, and a longer UTB was less sensitive to the soil models.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 717-728 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Science and Technology for the Built Environment |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Funding
This article is based upon work funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under the Geothermal Technologies Office, Low-Temperature and Co-Produced Resources Program. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ).