Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of leaf phenology on estimates of aboveground biomass density in a deciduous broadleaf forest from simulated GEDI lidar

  • K. C. Cushman
  • , John Armston
  • , Ralph Dubayah
  • , Laura Duncanson
  • , Steven Hancock
  • , David Janík
  • , Kamil Král
  • , Martin Krůček
  • , David M. Minor
  • , Hao Tang
  • , James R. Kellner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is a waveform lidar instrument on the International Space Station used to estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD) in temperate and tropical forests. Algorithms to predict footprint AGBD from GEDI relative height (RH) metrics were developed from simulated waveforms with leaf-on (growing season) conditions. Leaf-off GEDI data with lower canopy cover are expected to have shorter RH metrics, and are therefore excluded from GEDI’s gridded AGBD products. However, the effects of leaf phenology on RH metric heights, and implications for GEDI footprint AGBD models that can include multiple nonlinear RH predictors, have not been quantified. Here, we test the sensitivity of GEDI data and AGBD predictions to leaf phenology. We simulated GEDI data using high-density drone lidar collected in a temperate mountain forest in the Czech Republic under leaf-off and leaf-on conditions, 51 d apart. We compared simulated GEDI RH metrics and footprint-level AGBD predictions from GEDI Level 4 A models from leaf-off and leaf-on datasets. Mean canopy cover increased by 31% from leaf-off to leaf-on conditions, from 57% to 88%. RH metrics < RH50 were more sensitive to changes in leaf phenology than RH metrics ⩾ RH50. Candidate AGBD models for the deciduous-broadleaf-trees prediction stratum in Europe that were trained using leaf-on measurements exhibited a systematic prediction difference of 0.6%-19% when applied to leaf-off data, as compared to leaf-on predictions. Models with the least systematic prediction difference contained only the highest RH metrics, or contained multiple predictor terms that contained both positive and negative coefficients, such that the difference from systematically shorter leaf-off RH metrics was partially offset among the multiple terms. These results suggest that, with consideration of model choice, leaf-off GEDI data can be suitable for AGBD prediction, which could increase data availability and reduce sampling error in some forests.

Original languageEnglish
Article number065009
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was independently supported by Brown University and by NASA contracts to the University of Maryland and Brown. We are grateful to the NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program and to Hank Margolis and Michael Falkowski. We thank our colleagues on the GEDI Mission Science Team, including research technicians and graduate students whose work directly supported the mission. We thank Markus Birrer, Christoph Eck, Cristoph Falleger, Benedikt Imbach, Henry Johnson, Peggy and Henry D Sharpe Jr, Jan Trochta, Peter S Voss, Tomáˇs Vrˇska, and Carlo Zgraggen. K K, M K, and D J were supported by Inter- Action Grant LTAUSA18200.

Keywords

  • GEDI
  • aboveground biomass
  • forest structure
  • lidar
  • phenology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of leaf phenology on estimates of aboveground biomass density in a deciduous broadleaf forest from simulated GEDI lidar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this