Abstract
Molten salts are of great interest in the energy industry as coolants and heat transfer fluids due to their superior heat transfer properties and high operating temperatures. Due to these high temperatures and the corrosive properties of many molten salts, it can be difficult to perform fluid flow and heat transfer experiments of molten salt components in laboratory settings. Instead, surrogate fluids that operate at lower temperatures and match relevant dimensionless parameters of molten salts are suggested for such experiments. In this work, we examine two well-known surrogate fluids, water and Dowtherm A, and introduce two heat transfer fluids, Freezium 60 and Zitrec S-25, as candidate molten salt surrogates. We compare these fluids to common fluoride-, chloride-, and nitrate-based molten salts by considering temperature ranges over which their Prandtl numbers match. A model example at matched Prandtl and Reynolds number is used to determine the effects of using such surrogates on friction factor, pressure drop, Nusselt number, and pumping and heating power in a theorized experiment, and potential distortions based on Prandtl number mismatches are discussed. This article describes a distortion calculation methodology and quantifies the largest Prandtl number distortions encountered for various molten salt and surrogate pairs using a linearly scaled technique. Distortions between the fluids are seen to be small, but uncertainties in salt thermophysical properties motivate further research to understand the magnitude of such distortions and their subsequent effects on experimental outcomes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3554-3571 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | International Journal of Energy Research |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 10 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
This publication was prepared by Arturo Cabral under award 31310018M0031 from Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This work was supported by a Jeffress Trust Award in Interdisciplinary Research Program funded by the Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust, Bank of America, Trustee. Nomenclature Dh Hydraulic diameter (m) DPr Prandtl number distortion = Prms,i−Prsf,iPrms,i cP Specific heat (J/kg-K) f Friction factor = 64Relaminar;−1.8log6.9Re+ε3.7Dh1.11−2turbulent k Thermal conductivity (W/m-K) L Characteristic length (m) ṁ Mass flow rate (kg/s) Nu Nusselt number = 0.023Re4/5Pr0.4 Pr Prandtl number = cpμk ∆P Pressure drop = fLDh12ρu2 Qh Heating power (W) = ṁcp∆T Qp Pumping power (W) = V̇∆P Re Reynolds number = ρDhuμ u Velocity (m/s) V̇ Volumetric flow rate (m3/s) μ Dynamic viscosity (Pa-s) θ Nondimensional temperature Ti,ms−Tmin,msTmax,ms−Tmin,ms ρ Density (kg/m3) Subscripts ms Molten salt sf Surrogate fluids This work was supported by a Jeffress Trust Award in Interdisciplinary Research Program funded by the Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust, Bank of America, Trustee. Nomenclature Hydraulic diameter (m) Prandtl number distortion = Specific heat (J/kg‐K) Friction factor = Thermal conductivity (W/m‐K) Characteristic length (m) Mass flow rate (kg/s) Nusselt number = Prandtl number = Pressure drop = Heating power (W) = Pumping power (W) = Reynolds number = Velocity (m/s) Volumetric flow rate (m /s) Dynamic viscosity (Pa‐s) Nondimensional temperature Density (kg/m ) Subscripts Molten salt Surrogate fluids D h D Pr c P f k L Nu Pr Q h Q p Re u 3 μ θ ρ 3 ms sf
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |
Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust |
Keywords
- distortions
- molten salts
- scaling analysis
- surrogate fluids