TY - JOUR
T1 - Ideal MHD stability of a spherical tokamak power plant and a component test facility
AU - Hole, M. J.
AU - Wilson, H. R.
AU - Abeysuriya, R.
AU - Larson, J. W.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - We have investigated ideal MHD stability of two advanced spherical tokamak confinement concepts: the spherical tokamak power plant (STPP), a 3GW concept fusion power plasma producing 1GW of electric power, and the component test facility (CTF), a concept designed for in situ materials testing for ITER and beyond. Detailed stability studies for toroidal mode number n = 1, 2, 3 displacements are presented as a function of conformal wall radius Rw and on-axis safety factor q0. For the STPP marginal stability scans held the current profile fixed, but varied the total plasma current. For the CTF we have extended and parallelized earlier marginal stability scans to scan over both the plasma beta and q0 by varying the current profile to preserve the total plasma current. These confirm that both concepts are stable provided that the wall is sufficiently close and q0 sufficiently large (q0 < 2.8 for the power plant and q0 < 2.1 for the CTF). Both power plant and CTF configurations are found to be ballooning stable.
AB - We have investigated ideal MHD stability of two advanced spherical tokamak confinement concepts: the spherical tokamak power plant (STPP), a 3GW concept fusion power plasma producing 1GW of electric power, and the component test facility (CTF), a concept designed for in situ materials testing for ITER and beyond. Detailed stability studies for toroidal mode number n = 1, 2, 3 displacements are presented as a function of conformal wall radius Rw and on-axis safety factor q0. For the STPP marginal stability scans held the current profile fixed, but varied the total plasma current. For the CTF we have extended and parallelized earlier marginal stability scans to scan over both the plasma beta and q0 by varying the current profile to preserve the total plasma current. These confirm that both concepts are stable provided that the wall is sufficiently close and q0 sufficiently large (q0 < 2.8 for the power plant and q0 < 2.1 for the CTF). Both power plant and CTF configurations are found to be ballooning stable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650032461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/125005
DO - 10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/125005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78650032461
SN - 0741-3335
VL - 52
JO - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
JF - Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
IS - 12
M1 - 125005
ER -
