Hydrologic impacts of subsurface drainage at the field scale: Climate, landscape and anthropogenic controls

Brandon P. Sloan, Nandita B. Basu, Ricardo Mantilla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Installation of subsurface drainage systems is one of the most common modifications of the agricultural landscape, and while it is well accepted that these systems alter the hydrologic regime, the nature and magnitude of such alterations remains poorly understood. We explore the impact of drainage systems using the field-scale model DRAINMOD and rainfall and soils data for Iowa. Our objective is to understand how climate, landscape and anthropogenic controls modify the hydrological response at the field scale. We show that drainage systems do not significantly alter the annual peak flows (QP). This is because QP is typically generated by the largest storms of the year for which the additional soil storage created by the drains does not significantly alter the total quick-flow volume of water entering the streams, and thus the hydrograph peaks. We identify a threshold storm size (~6cm/day for Iowa) beyond which tiles have minimal impact on the peak flow. Effects are apparent, however, for peak flows generated by other storms in which the percent of peak flow reduction is a function of the storm size and the antecedent moisture conditions. The effect of the drains on runoff production is further investigated using the daily Flashiness Index (FI). For soils with high hydraulic conductivity (K), tile drains increase the FI due to faster flow routing through subsurface drains, while for soils with low K, drainage decreases flashiness due to availability of increased soil storage that reduces surface runoff. We conclude that tile drains homogenize spatial patterns in hydrologic response by minimizing response differences between soil types. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of tile spacing and show that the FI decreases with an increase in drain spacing up to an optimal spacing (SM), beyond which FI increases with greater spacing. The FI-SM relationship was found to be a function of soil type and rainfall intensity, with the U-shaped behavior more apparent for low K soils and high rainfall intensity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalAgricultural Water Management
Volume165
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agricultural hydrology
  • DRAINMOD
  • Flooding
  • Human impact
  • Intensively managed landscapes
  • Landscape homogenization
  • Tile drainage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydrologic impacts of subsurface drainage at the field scale: Climate, landscape and anthropogenic controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this