Abstract
Several global optimization methods are reviewed that attempt to ensure that the integral Gibbs energy of a closed isothermal isobaric system is a global minimum to satisfy the necessary and sufficient conditions for thermodynamic equilibrium. In particular, the integral Gibbs energy function of a multi-component system containing non-ideal phases may be highly non-linear and non-convex, which makes finding a global minimum a challenge. Consequently, a poor numerical approach may lead one to the false belief of equilibrium. Furthermore, confirming that one reaches a global minimum and that this is achieved with satisfactory computational performance becomes increasingly more challenging in systems containing many chemical elements and a correspondingly large number of species and phases. Several numerical methods that have been used for this specific purpose are reviewed with a benchmark study of three of the more promising methods using five case studies of varying complexity. A modification of the conventional Branch and Bound method is presented that is well suited to a wide array of thermodynamic applications, including complex phases with many constituents and sublattices, and ionic phases that must adhere to charge neutrality constraints. Also, a novel method is presented that efficiently solves the system of linear equations that exploits the unique structure of the Hessian matrix, which reduces the calculation from a O(N3) operation to a O(N) operation. This combined approach demonstrates efficiency, reliability and capabilities that are favorable for integration of thermodynamic computations into multi-physics codes with inherent performance considerations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-96 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Computational Materials Science |
Volume | 118 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2016 |
Funding
This work was funded by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program under the Advanced Modeling and Simulation Office (AMSO) in the Nuclear Energy Office in the U.S. Department of Energy .
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Advanced Modeling and Simulation Office | |
Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation | |
U.S. Department of Energy |
Keywords
- Gibbs energy minimization
- Global minimum
- Global optimization
- Necessary and sufficient conditions