Gibberellin-responding and non-responding dwarf mutants in foxtail millet

Jin Gui Chen, Xie Zhou, Yu Zong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The sensitivity of foxtail millet (Setaria italica Beauv.) dwarf mutants to GA was studied. Seedlings of dwarf mutants, Aininghuang (ANH) and CH84113 were treated with GAs (GA1, GA4, GA9, GA19 and GA20) using the micro-drop method, or by soaking in GA3 solution. Plants were also sprayed with GA3 solution at the jointing stage. It was found that ANH was a GA-responding dwarf mutant, whose leaf blade, leaf sheath and internode length increased significantly after GA application, whereas CH84113 was a non-GA-responding dwarf mutant. However, the mesocotyl in etiolated seedlings of both ANH and CH84113 responded to exogenous GA3 in a similar way. With the help of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, it was found that the endogenous GA1+3 level in leaves was lower in the GA-responding dwarf mutant ANH, but higher in the non-GA-responding dwarf mutant CH84113, compared with levels in normal cultivars.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-24
Number of pages6
JournalPlant Growth Regulation
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was financially supported by a grant from Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China. Thanks are due to Dr. Richard M. Napier, Department of Cell Physiology, Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK, for a critical reading of the text and valuable suggestions.

Keywords

  • Dwarfism
  • Foxtail millet (Setaria italica Beauv.)
  • Gibberellin
  • Mutant
  • Sensitivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gibberellin-responding and non-responding dwarf mutants in foxtail millet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this