Geochemistry of molybdenum in the continental crust

Allison T. Greaney, Roberta L. Rudnick, Richard M. Gaschnig, Joseph B. Whalen, Béatrice Luais, John D. Clemens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of molybdenum as a quantitative paleo-atmosphere redox sensor is predicated on the assumption that Mo is hosted in sulfides in the upper continental crust (UCC). This assumption is tested here by determining the mineralogical hosts of Mo in typical Archean, Proterozoic, and Phanerozoic upper crustal igneous rocks, spanning a compositional range from basalt to granite. Common igneous sulfides such as pyrite and chalcopyrite contain very little Mo (commonly below detection limits of around 10 ng/g) and are not a significant crustal Mo host. By contrast, volcanic glass and Ti-bearing phases such as titanite, ilmenite, magnetite, and rutile contain significantly higher Mo concentrations (e.g., up to 40 µg/g in titanite), and can account for the whole-rock Mo budget in most rocks. However, mass balance between whole-rock and mineral data is not achieved in 4 out of 10 granites analyzed with in-situ methods, where Mo may be hosted in undetected trace molybdenite. Significant Mo depletion (i.e., UCC-normalized Mo/Ce < 1) occurs in nearly every granitic rock analyzed here, but not in oceanic basalts or their differentiates (Greaney et al., 2017; Jenner and O'Neill, 2012). On average, granites are missing ∼60% of their expected Mo contents. There are two possible reasons for this: (1) Mo partitions into an aqueous magmatic vapor/fluid phase that is expelled from cooling plutons, and/or (2) Mo is partitioned into titaniferous phases during partial melting and fractional crystallization of an evolving magma. The first scenario is likely given the high solubility of oxidized Mo. However, correlations between Mo/Ce and Nb/La in several plutonic suites suggest fractionating phases such as rutile or Fe-Ti oxides may sequester Mo in lower crustal rocks or in subducting slabs in arc settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-54
Number of pages19
JournalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume238
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We thank Aleisha Johnson, George Helz, Gary Stevens, and Scott Wipperfurth for valuable discussions, Richard Ash, Phil Piccoli, and Andrew Kylander-Clark for analytical assistance, and Steve Romaniello for assistance in reproducing the whole-rock data in the ASU Keck Lab for Biogeochemistry. We also thank the three reviewers (Thomas Ulrich, and two anonymous reviewers) for their suggestions that helped us to improve the paper. The work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant EAR 133810 (A. Anbar, PI; R.L. Rudnick, co-I), EAR 1757313, and the University of Maryland.

FundersFunder number
National Science FoundationEAR 133810, EAR 1757313, 1757313
University of Maryland

    Keywords

    • Continental crust
    • Geochemistry
    • Molybdenite
    • Molybdenum
    • Partitioning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Geochemistry of molybdenum in the continental crust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this