TY - GEN
T1 - FuSion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF)
T2 - 2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, SOFE 2011
AU - Peng, Y. K.M.
AU - Park, J. M.
AU - Canik, J. M.
AU - Diem, S. J.
AU - Sontag, A. C.
AU - Lumsdaine, A.
AU - Katoh, Yl
AU - Burgess, R. W.
AU - Korsah, K.
AU - Patton, B. D.
AU - Wagner, J. C.
AU - Fogarty, P. J.
AU - Sawan, M.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - A compact (R0∼1.2-1.3m), low aspect ratio, low-Q (<3) Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) was recently assessed to provide a fully integrated, D-T-fueled, continuously driven plasma, volumetric nuclear environment of copious neutrons. This environment would be used, for the first time, to carry out discovery-driven research in fusion nuclear science and materials, in parallel with and complementary to ITER. This research would aim to test, discover, and understand new nuclear-nonnuclear synergistic interactions involving plasma material interactions, neutron material interactions, tritium fuel breeding and transport, and power extraction, and innovate and develop solutions for DEMO components. This facility properly designed could provide, initially using conservative JET-level D-T plasmas in Hot-Ion H-Mode, and an outboard fusion neutron flux of ∼0.33 MW/m 2. If the research, facility operation, and component solutions were successful, the performance could be raised to 1 MW/m2 (fusion power ∼76 MW) by reaching for twice the JET plasma pressure and Q. Stable high-safety factor q and β plasmas would be chosen to minimize plasma-induced disruptions, and deliver reliably a neutron fluence of 1 MW-yr/m2, if duty factors of ∼10% (accumulated plasma burn time in a year) can be achieved. Such duty factors would therefore require time-efficient installation and replacement of all components using remote handling (RH). These in turn would require RH-compatible modular designs for all internal components, a single-turn toroidal field coil center-post, and placement of support structures and vacuum seal welds behind the internal and shielding components. RH-enabled hot-cell laboratories would enable preparation and investigations of damages of the internal test components. The scientific and technical basis for such an FNSF, and the research needed in the next decade to manage the potential risks in its research capabilities, will be described.
AB - A compact (R0∼1.2-1.3m), low aspect ratio, low-Q (<3) Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) was recently assessed to provide a fully integrated, D-T-fueled, continuously driven plasma, volumetric nuclear environment of copious neutrons. This environment would be used, for the first time, to carry out discovery-driven research in fusion nuclear science and materials, in parallel with and complementary to ITER. This research would aim to test, discover, and understand new nuclear-nonnuclear synergistic interactions involving plasma material interactions, neutron material interactions, tritium fuel breeding and transport, and power extraction, and innovate and develop solutions for DEMO components. This facility properly designed could provide, initially using conservative JET-level D-T plasmas in Hot-Ion H-Mode, and an outboard fusion neutron flux of ∼0.33 MW/m 2. If the research, facility operation, and component solutions were successful, the performance could be raised to 1 MW/m2 (fusion power ∼76 MW) by reaching for twice the JET plasma pressure and Q. Stable high-safety factor q and β plasmas would be chosen to minimize plasma-induced disruptions, and deliver reliably a neutron fluence of 1 MW-yr/m2, if duty factors of ∼10% (accumulated plasma burn time in a year) can be achieved. Such duty factors would therefore require time-efficient installation and replacement of all components using remote handling (RH). These in turn would require RH-compatible modular designs for all internal components, a single-turn toroidal field coil center-post, and placement of support structures and vacuum seal welds behind the internal and shielding components. RH-enabled hot-cell laboratories would enable preparation and investigations of damages of the internal test components. The scientific and technical basis for such an FNSF, and the research needed in the next decade to manage the potential risks in its research capabilities, will be described.
KW - duty factor
KW - fusion nuclear science
KW - low Q
KW - modular internal components
KW - neutron fluence
KW - remote handling
KW - single-turn magnet
KW - spherical tokamak
KW - stable plasma condition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955167073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052222
DO - 10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052222
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:80955167073
SN - 9781457706691
T3 - Proceedings - Symposium on Fusion Engineering
BT - 2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, SOFE 2011
Y2 - 26 June 2011 through 30 June 2011
ER -