From remotely-sensed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to ecosystem structure, function, and service: Part II—Harnessing data

Ying Sun, Jiaming Wen, Lianhong Gu, Joanna Joiner, Christine Y. Chang, Christiaan van der Tol, Albert Porcar-Castell, Troy Magney, Lixin Wang, Leiqiu Hu, Uwe Rascher, Pablo Zarco-Tejada, Christopher B. Barrett, Jiameng Lai, Jimei Han, Zhenqi Luo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although our observing capabilities of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have been growing rapidly, the quality and consistency of SIF datasets are still in an active stage of research and development. As a result, there are considerable inconsistencies among diverse SIF datasets at all scales and the widespread applications of them have led to contradictory findings. The present review is the second of the two companion reviews, and data oriented. It aims to (1) synthesize the variety, scale, and uncertainty of existing SIF datasets, (2) synthesize the diverse applications in the sector of ecology, agriculture, hydrology, climate, and socioeconomics, and (3) clarify how such data inconsistency superimposed with the theoretical complexities laid out in (Sun et al., 2023) may impact process interpretation of various applications and contribute to inconsistent findings. We emphasize that accurate interpretation of the functional relationships between SIF and other ecological indicators is contingent upon complete understanding of SIF data quality and uncertainty. Biases and uncertainties in SIF observations can significantly confound interpretation of their relationships and how such relationships respond to environmental variations. Built upon our syntheses, we summarize existing gaps and uncertainties in current SIF observations. Further, we offer our perspectives on innovations needed to help improve informing ecosystem structure, function, and service under climate change, including enhancing in-situ SIF observing capability especially in “data desert” regions, improving cross-instrument data standardization and network coordination, and advancing applications by fully harnessing theory and data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2893-2925
Number of pages33
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Funding

YS, JW, JL, and ZL acknowledge support from NSF Macrosystem Biology (Award 1926488), NASA-CMS (80NSSC21K1058), NASA-FINESST (80NSSC20K1646), NASA MEaSures project, USDA-NIFA Hatch Fund (1014740), and the Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund. CYC acknowledges support from USDA, Agricultural Research Service. JL acknowledges the Saltonstall Fellowship from the Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University. LH acknowledges support from NASA-IDS (80NSSC20K1263) and NASA-HAQAST (80NSSC21K0430). JJ is supported by NASA through the Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) science team. LW acknowledges partial support from NSF Division of Earth Sciences (EAR-1554894). YS, JW, LH, and CBB also acknowledge support from USAID Feed the Future program (7200AA18CA00014). TSM acknowledges the Macrosystems Biology and NEON-Enabled Science program at NSF (award 1926090). ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. We acknowledge Kathleen Kanaley for proofreading. YS, JW, JL, and ZL acknowledge support from NSF Macrosystem Biology (Award 1926488), NASA‐CMS (80NSSC21K1058), NASA‐FINESST (80NSSC20K1646), NASA MEaSures project, USDA‐NIFA Hatch Fund (1014740), and the Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund. CYC acknowledges support from USDA, Agricultural Research Service. JL acknowledges the Saltonstall Fellowship from the Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University. LH acknowledges support from NASA‐IDS (80NSSC20K1263) and NASA‐HAQAST (80NSSC21K0430). JJ is supported by NASA through the Arctic‐Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) science team. LW acknowledges partial support from NSF Division of Earth Sciences (EAR‐1554894). YS, JW, LH, and CBB also acknowledge support from USAID Feed the Future program (7200AA18CA00014). TSM acknowledges the Macrosystems Biology and NEON‐Enabled Science program at NSF (award 1926090). ORNL is managed by UT‐Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. We acknowledge Kathleen Kanaley for proofreading.

FundersFunder number
Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund
NASA-CMS
NASA-FINESST
NASA-HAQAST
NASA-IDS
NASA‐CMS80NSSC21K1058
NASA‐FINESST80NSSC20K1646
NASA‐HAQAST80NSSC21K0430
NASA‐IDS80NSSC20K1263
Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University
USDA‐NIFA Hatch Fund
National Science Foundation1926488
U.S. Department of EnergyDE‐AC05‐00OR22725
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Division of Earth SciencesEAR‐1554894
United States Agency for International Development1926090, 7200AA18CA00014
National Institute of Food and Agriculture1014740
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Agricultural Research Service

    Keywords

    • SIF
    • carbon cycle
    • climate change
    • photosynthesis
    • precision agriculture
    • retrievals
    • stress monitoring and early warning
    • vegetation index

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From remotely-sensed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to ecosystem structure, function, and service: Part II—Harnessing data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this