Abstract
Although our observing capabilities of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have been growing rapidly, the quality and consistency of SIF datasets are still in an active stage of research and development. As a result, there are considerable inconsistencies among diverse SIF datasets at all scales and the widespread applications of them have led to contradictory findings. The present review is the second of the two companion reviews, and data oriented. It aims to (1) synthesize the variety, scale, and uncertainty of existing SIF datasets, (2) synthesize the diverse applications in the sector of ecology, agriculture, hydrology, climate, and socioeconomics, and (3) clarify how such data inconsistency superimposed with the theoretical complexities laid out in (Sun et al., 2023) may impact process interpretation of various applications and contribute to inconsistent findings. We emphasize that accurate interpretation of the functional relationships between SIF and other ecological indicators is contingent upon complete understanding of SIF data quality and uncertainty. Biases and uncertainties in SIF observations can significantly confound interpretation of their relationships and how such relationships respond to environmental variations. Built upon our syntheses, we summarize existing gaps and uncertainties in current SIF observations. Further, we offer our perspectives on innovations needed to help improve informing ecosystem structure, function, and service under climate change, including enhancing in-situ SIF observing capability especially in “data desert” regions, improving cross-instrument data standardization and network coordination, and advancing applications by fully harnessing theory and data.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2893-2925 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | Global Change Biology |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2023 |
Funding
YS, JW, JL, and ZL acknowledge support from NSF Macrosystem Biology (Award 1926488), NASA-CMS (80NSSC21K1058), NASA-FINESST (80NSSC20K1646), NASA MEaSures project, USDA-NIFA Hatch Fund (1014740), and the Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund. CYC acknowledges support from USDA, Agricultural Research Service. JL acknowledges the Saltonstall Fellowship from the Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University. LH acknowledges support from NASA-IDS (80NSSC20K1263) and NASA-HAQAST (80NSSC21K0430). JJ is supported by NASA through the Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) science team. LW acknowledges partial support from NSF Division of Earth Sciences (EAR-1554894). YS, JW, LH, and CBB also acknowledge support from USAID Feed the Future program (7200AA18CA00014). TSM acknowledges the Macrosystems Biology and NEON-Enabled Science program at NSF (award 1926090). ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. We acknowledge Kathleen Kanaley for proofreading. YS, JW, JL, and ZL acknowledge support from NSF Macrosystem Biology (Award 1926488), NASA‐CMS (80NSSC21K1058), NASA‐FINESST (80NSSC20K1646), NASA MEaSures project, USDA‐NIFA Hatch Fund (1014740), and the Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund. CYC acknowledges support from USDA, Agricultural Research Service. JL acknowledges the Saltonstall Fellowship from the Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University. LH acknowledges support from NASA‐IDS (80NSSC20K1263) and NASA‐HAQAST (80NSSC21K0430). JJ is supported by NASA through the Arctic‐Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) science team. LW acknowledges partial support from NSF Division of Earth Sciences (EAR‐1554894). YS, JW, LH, and CBB also acknowledge support from USAID Feed the Future program (7200AA18CA00014). TSM acknowledges the Macrosystems Biology and NEON‐Enabled Science program at NSF (award 1926090). ORNL is managed by UT‐Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. We acknowledge Kathleen Kanaley for proofreading.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Cornell Initiative for Digital Agriculture Research Innovation Fund | |
NASA-CMS | |
NASA-FINESST | |
NASA-HAQAST | |
NASA-IDS | |
NASA‐CMS | 80NSSC21K1058 |
NASA‐FINESST | 80NSSC20K1646 |
NASA‐HAQAST | 80NSSC21K0430 |
NASA‐IDS | 80NSSC20K1263 |
Soil and Crop Science Section at Cornell University | |
USDA‐NIFA Hatch Fund | |
National Science Foundation | 1926488 |
U.S. Department of Energy | DE‐AC05‐00OR22725 |
National Aeronautics and Space Administration | |
Division of Earth Sciences | EAR‐1554894 |
United States Agency for International Development | 1926090, 7200AA18CA00014 |
National Institute of Food and Agriculture | 1014740 |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | |
Agricultural Research Service |
Keywords
- SIF
- carbon cycle
- climate change
- photosynthesis
- precision agriculture
- retrievals
- stress monitoring and early warning
- vegetation index