Fluctuation in levels of endogenous hormones after decapitation and 6-benzyl amino purine treatment in azalea, and their relationship to apical dominance

J. G. Chen, H. Y. Zhao, X. Zhou, L. S. Mao, X. X. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Endogenous levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, gibberellins (GAs) and abscisic acid (ABA) in 'Siji' azalea (Rhododendron obtusum), which had been sprayed once with 1000 mg/16-benzyl amino purine (6-BA) or decapitated, were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. It was found that decapitation could significantly decrease the level of IAA in the shoot segment (0.5 cm in length just below the terminal bud, where axillary buds will emerge). A single application of 6-BA elicited a decrease of IAA level in the shoot segment, whereas an increase of IAA level in the terminal bud, and elicited an increase of isopentenyladenine and isopentenyladenosine, zeatin and zeatin riboside, in both the shoot segment and the terminal bud. It was also found that both the 6-BA treatment and decapitation could elicit an increase of GA 1+3 level and a decrease of ABA level in the shoot segment (and the terminal bud).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalScientia Horticulturae
Volume71
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1997
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was financially supportedb y a grant from Natural Science Foundation from Jiangsu Province, P.R. China. Thanks are due to Dr. Morris G. Cline, Department of Plant Biology, Ohio State University, USA, for critical reading of the text.

FundersFunder number
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

    Keywords

    • 6-Benzyl amino purine
    • Apical dominance
    • Azalea
    • Decapitation
    • Plant hormones

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fluctuation in levels of endogenous hormones after decapitation and 6-benzyl amino purine treatment in azalea, and their relationship to apical dominance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this