TY - JOUR
T1 - FloodNet
T2 - A High Resolution Aerial Imagery Dataset for Post Flood Scene Understanding
AU - Rahnemoonfar, Maryam
AU - Chowdhury, Tashnim
AU - Sarkar, Argho
AU - Varshney, Debvrat
AU - Yari, Masoud
AU - Murphy, Robin Roberson
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 IEEE.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Visual scene understanding is the core task in making any crucial decision in any computer vision system. Although popular computer vision datasets like Cityscapes, MS-COCO, PASCAL provide good benchmarks for several tasks (e.g. image classification, segmentation, object detection), these datasets are hardly suitable for post disaster damage assessments. On the other hand, existing natural disaster datasets include mainly satellite imagery which has low spatial resolution and a high revisit period. Therefore, they do not have a scope to provide quick and efficient damage assessment tasks. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can effortlessly access difficult places during any disaster and collect high resolution imagery that is required for aforementioned tasks of computer vision. To address these issues we present a high resolution UAV imagery, FloodNet, captured after the hurricane Harvey. This dataset demonstrates the post flooded damages of the affected areas. The images are labeled pixel-wise for semantic segmentation task and questions are produced for the task of visual question answering. FloodNet poses several challenges including detection of flooded roads and buildings and distinguishing between natural water and flooded water. With the advancement of deep learning algorithms, we can analyze the impact of any disaster which can make a precise understanding of the affected areas. In this paper, we compare and contrast the performances of baseline methods for image classification, semantic segmentation, and visual question answering on our dataset. FloodNet dataset can be downloaded from here: https://github.com/BinaLab/FloodNet-Supervised_v1.0.
AB - Visual scene understanding is the core task in making any crucial decision in any computer vision system. Although popular computer vision datasets like Cityscapes, MS-COCO, PASCAL provide good benchmarks for several tasks (e.g. image classification, segmentation, object detection), these datasets are hardly suitable for post disaster damage assessments. On the other hand, existing natural disaster datasets include mainly satellite imagery which has low spatial resolution and a high revisit period. Therefore, they do not have a scope to provide quick and efficient damage assessment tasks. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can effortlessly access difficult places during any disaster and collect high resolution imagery that is required for aforementioned tasks of computer vision. To address these issues we present a high resolution UAV imagery, FloodNet, captured after the hurricane Harvey. This dataset demonstrates the post flooded damages of the affected areas. The images are labeled pixel-wise for semantic segmentation task and questions are produced for the task of visual question answering. FloodNet poses several challenges including detection of flooded roads and buildings and distinguishing between natural water and flooded water. With the advancement of deep learning algorithms, we can analyze the impact of any disaster which can make a precise understanding of the affected areas. In this paper, we compare and contrast the performances of baseline methods for image classification, semantic segmentation, and visual question answering on our dataset. FloodNet dataset can be downloaded from here: https://github.com/BinaLab/FloodNet-Supervised_v1.0.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - deep learning
KW - hurricane Harvey
KW - image classification
KW - machine learning
KW - natural disaster dataset
KW - remote sensing
KW - semantic segmentation
KW - unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
KW - visual question answering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117566256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090981
DO - 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090981
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117566256
SN - 2169-3536
VL - 9
SP - 89644
EP - 89654
JO - IEEE Access
JF - IEEE Access
M1 - 9460988
ER -