Abstract
In ITER, tritium retention primarily occurs through co-deposition with beryllium. To avoid exceeding the strict tritium inventory limit, efficient tritium recovery techniques are essential. Baking is the ITER baseline for tritium recovery, but its effectiveness in removing tritium from thick beryllium layers is limited. A raised strike point scenario is considered an alternative method for removing tritium from the ITER inner vertical divertor target by heating components via plasma flux. This paper presents SOLPS-ITER code simulations conducted under various conditions, assessing the divertor performance and tritium outgassing of the raised strike point scenario. As the strike point is raised, recycled neutrals are not efficiently baffled by the dome and scrape-off layer, significantly changing the neutral trajectory and ionization source distribution. This improves detachment accessibility but worsens core-edge compatibility compared to the baseline scenario. However, in the partially detached condition, the impact of raising the strike point, perpendicular transport, and q 95 on target heat flux is not significant, as it primarily scales with the input power. Target heat flux is translated to target surface temperature using a simplified heat transfer model that considers the 3D target monoblock geometry and active cooling condition, excluding Be layer thermal properties. For partially detached divertor conditions, the bulk tungsten monoblock surface temperature remains below the baking temperature, which is insufficient for efficient tritium outgassing under the actively cooled ITER divertor condition. However, considering the potential thermal contact resistance between the beryllium and tungsten layers, which may significantly impact temperature distribution, the temperature of the beryllium layer can be raised to a level sufficient for efficient tritium outgassing. Therefore, the raised strike point scenario can be considered as an alternative in-vessel tritium removal technique.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 076027 |
Journal | Nuclear Fusion |
Volume | 63 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2023 |
Funding
This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, with the US Department of Energy (DOE). Work supported in part by the US DOE under Contracts DE-AC05-00OR22725. This work was supported in part by the National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2019M1A7A1A03087560). The first author, J.-S. Park, is also supported through the Monaco/ITER postdoctoral fellowship program (2019–2020). The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the ITER Organization. The authors are grateful to Greg De Temmerman for the great help in initiating this study.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy | DE-AC05-00OR22725 |
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning | NRF-2019M1A7A1A03087560 |
National Research Foundation of Korea |
Keywords
- Be co-deposits
- ITER
- SOLPS-ITER
- detritiation
- raised strike point
- tritium removal