Evaluation of models determined by neutron diffraction and proposed improvements to their validation and deposition

Dorothee Liebschner, Pavel V. Afonine, Nigel W. Moriarty, Paul Langan, Paul D. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains a growing number of models that have been determined using neutron diffraction or a hybrid method that combines X-ray and neutron diffraction. The advantage of neutron diffraction experiments is that the positions of all atoms can be determined, including H atoms, which are hardly detectable by X-ray diffraction. This allows the determination of protonation states and the assignment of H atoms to water molecules. Because neutrons are scattered differently by hydrogen and its isotope deuterium, neutron diffraction in combination with H/D exchange can provide information on accessibility, dynamics and chemical lability. In this study, the deposited data, models and model-to-data fit for all PDB entries that used neutron diffraction as the source of experimental data have been analysed. In many cases, the reported Rwork and Rfree values were not reproducible. In such cases, the model and data files were analysed to identify the reasons for this mismatch. The issues responsible for the discrepancies are summarized and explained. The analysis unveiled limitations to the annotation, deposition and validation of models and data, and a lack of community-wide accepted standards for the description of neutron models and data, as well as deficiencies in current model refinement tools. Most of the issues identified concern the handling of H atoms. Since the primary use of neutron macromolecular crystallography is to locate and directly visualize H atoms, it is important to address these issues, so that the deposited neutron models allow the retrieval of the maximum amount of information with the smallest effort of manual intervention. A path forward to improving the annotation, validation and deposition of neutron models and hybrid X-ray and neutron models is suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)800-813
Number of pages14
JournalActa Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of NIH/ NIGMS through grants 5P01GM063210 and 1R01GM071939. Our work was supported in part by the US Department of We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of NIH/NIGMS through grants 5P01GM063210 and 1R01GM071939. Our work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy under Contracts No. DE-AC03-76SF00098 and DEAC02-05CH11231.

FundersFunder number
US Department of
National Institutes of Health
U.S. Department of EnergyDEAC02-05CH11231, DE-AC03-76SF00098
National Institute of General Medical SciencesR01GM071939, 5P01GM063210

    Keywords

    • H/D exchange
    • Model validation
    • Neutron crystallography
    • PDB data mining
    • Phenix

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of models determined by neutron diffraction and proposed improvements to their validation and deposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this