Evaluation of CLM4 solar radiation partitioning scheme using remote sensing and site level FPAR datasets

Kai Wang, Jiafu Mao, Robert E. Dickinson, Xiaoying Shi, Wilfred M. Post, Zaichun Zhu, Ranga B. Myneni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper examines a land surface solar radiation partitioning scheme, i.e., that of the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) with coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles. Taking advantage of a unique 30-year fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) dataset, derived from the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data set, multiple other remote sensing datasets, and site level observations, we evaluated the CLM4 FPAR's seasonal cycle, diurnal cycle, long-term trends, and spatial patterns. Our findings show that the model generally agrees with observations in the seasonal cycle, long-term trends, and spatial patterns, but does not reproduce the diurnal cycle. Discrepancies also exist in seasonality magnitudes, peak value months, and spatial heterogeneity. We identify the discrepancy in the diurnal cycle as, due to, the absence of dependence on sun angle in the model. Implementation of sun angle dependence in a one-dimensional (1-D) model is proposed. The need for better relating of vegetation to climate in the model, indicated by long-term trends, is also noted. Evaluation of the CLM4 land surface solar radiation partitioning scheme using remote sensing and site level FPAR datasets provides targets for future development in its representation of this naturally complicated process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2857-2882
Number of pages26
JournalRemote Sensing
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Keywords

  • Climate modeling
  • Evaluation
  • Land surface
  • Solar radiation partitioning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of CLM4 solar radiation partitioning scheme using remote sensing and site level FPAR datasets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this