TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating baseline kidney function in hospitalized patients with impaired kidney function
AU - Siew, Edward D.
AU - Alp Ikizler, T.
AU - Matheny, Michael E.
AU - Shi, Yaping
AU - Schildcrout, Jonathan S.
AU - Danciu, Ioana
AU - Dwyer, Jamie P.
AU - Srchai, Manakan
AU - Hung, Adriana M.
AU - Smith, James P.
AU - Peterson, Josh F.
PY - 2012/5/1
Y1 - 2012/5/1
N2 - Background and objectives Inaccurate determination of baseline kidney function can misclassify acute kidney injury (AKI) and affect the study of AKI-related outcomes. No consensus exists on how to optimally determine baseline kidney function when multiple preadmission creatinine measurements are available. Design, setting, participants, & measurements The accuracy of commonly used methods for estimating baseline serum creatinine was compared with that of a reference standard adjudicated by a panel of board-certified nephrologists in 379 patients with AKI or CKD admitted to a tertiary referral center. Results Agreement between estimating methods and the reference standard was highest when using creatinine values measured 7-365 days before admission.During this interval, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the mean outpatient serum creatinine level (0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.92]) was higher than the most recent outpatient (ICC, 0.84 [95%CI, 0.80-0.88]; P<0.001) and the nadir outpatient (ICC, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76- 0.87; P<0.001) serum creatinine. Using the final creatinine value from a prior inpatient admission increased the ICC of the most recent outpatient creatinine method (0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]). Performance of all methods declined or was unchanged when the time interval was broadened to 2 years or included serum creatinine measured within a week of admission. Conclusions The mean outpatient serum creatinine measured within a year of hospitalization most closely approximates nephrologist-adjudicated serum creatinine values.
AB - Background and objectives Inaccurate determination of baseline kidney function can misclassify acute kidney injury (AKI) and affect the study of AKI-related outcomes. No consensus exists on how to optimally determine baseline kidney function when multiple preadmission creatinine measurements are available. Design, setting, participants, & measurements The accuracy of commonly used methods for estimating baseline serum creatinine was compared with that of a reference standard adjudicated by a panel of board-certified nephrologists in 379 patients with AKI or CKD admitted to a tertiary referral center. Results Agreement between estimating methods and the reference standard was highest when using creatinine values measured 7-365 days before admission.During this interval, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the mean outpatient serum creatinine level (0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.92]) was higher than the most recent outpatient (ICC, 0.84 [95%CI, 0.80-0.88]; P<0.001) and the nadir outpatient (ICC, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76- 0.87; P<0.001) serum creatinine. Using the final creatinine value from a prior inpatient admission increased the ICC of the most recent outpatient creatinine method (0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]). Performance of all methods declined or was unchanged when the time interval was broadened to 2 years or included serum creatinine measured within a week of admission. Conclusions The mean outpatient serum creatinine measured within a year of hospitalization most closely approximates nephrologist-adjudicated serum creatinine values.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84860770062
U2 - 10.2215/CJN.10821011
DO - 10.2215/CJN.10821011
M3 - Article
C2 - 22422536
AN - SCOPUS:84860770062
SN - 1555-9041
VL - 7
SP - 712
EP - 719
JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 5
ER -