Abstract
Our Letter missed a factor of 3 in the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of magnon state |k,n⟩ with frequency ωn(k). When summing over states with 1±1 magnons, we should have added rather than subtracted factors of 2 and 1 using (Formula Presented). is a factor of 3 higher than in Eq. (5) of this letter and all of our numerical results should be increased by factors of 3. This manuscript has been partially supported by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes [1].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 059901 |
| Journal | Physical Review Letters |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Feb 3 2023 |
Funding
This manuscript has been partially supported by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes .
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Energy | |
| UT-Battelle | DE-AC05-00OR22725 |