Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability

Virginia H. Dale, Keith L. Kline, Esther S. Parish, Sarah E. Eichler

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives: The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods: The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Results: The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed. Conclusions: Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1199-1218
Number of pages20
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Funding

Dale’s initial work on the approach was funded by a contract from the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) Project CS-1259 to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Dale and Parish were also supported by the ORNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development. Kline’s research includes field work in twelve developing countries from 1980 to 2008 supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office supported recent research to refine the approach and prepare this manuscript. In addition, support from the IEA Bioenergy Task 43 “Biomass feedstock for energy markets” is gratefully acknowledged. The Yaqui Valley case study mentioned in the paper was funded by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the U.S. Agency for International Development. ORNL is managed by the UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. ORNL researcher Yetta Jager provided useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Dale?s initial work on the approach was funded by a contract from the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) Project CS-1259 to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Dale and Parish were also supported by the ORNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development. Kline?s research includes field work in twelve developing countries from 1980 to 2008 supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office supported recent research to refine the approach and prepare this manuscript. In addition, support from the IEA Bioenergy Task 43 ?Biomass feedstock for energy markets? is gratefully acknowledged. The Yaqui Valley case study mentioned in the paper was funded by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the U.S. Agency for International Development. ORNL is managed by the UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. ORNL researcher Yetta Jager provided useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Bioenergy
  • Indicators
  • Landscape sustainability
  • Stakeholders
  • Tradeoffs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this