Energy savings and life cycle cost analysis of advanced double skin facade system applied to old apartments in South Korea

Yeobeom Yoon, Byeongmo Seo, Junghyun Mun, Soolyeon Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

South Korea is one of the most densely populated countries in the world, and the population density in urban areas is much higher among others. Apartments are the most common form of residential buildings due to their high population density. More than 60% of domestic residential buildings are apartments, with more than 10 million households. The high population density is a problem that has long plagued South Korea because more than 45% of apartments are old apartments that are more than 20 years old. Old apartment buildings have low thermal performance that results in lots of energy consumption. Balconies, which worked as a thermal buffer, are also being removed by residents to expand indoor space. According to the green remodeling project supported by the Korean government, the typical retrofitting method is replacing external windows with the high-efficiency window in old apartments in South Korea. This paper proposes a retrofitting method using an extended double-skin façade (DSF) system that replaces exterior windows and acts as a thermal buffer. The simulation model is developed with the EnergyPlus simulation program to conduct energy performance analyses. The simulation model has been calibrated using actual experimental data collected between October 1, 2019, and January 15, 2020. Results show that the cooling, heating, and lighting energy can be reduced up to 44.1% by fully utilizing electric energy generated by solar PV panels integrated with the DSF system. The payback period is about 15 years based on the energy price provided by the utility company. Although the payback period is long, it has great potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reductions. The DSF system should be considered as a way of renovation, considering other factors such as increased real estate values and energy cost increases in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106535
JournalJournal of Building Engineering
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2023

Funding

Equation (12) shows the amount that could be recovered in the first year of DSF installation. The cost of replacing windows refers to the cost of replacing windows (typical retrofitting method), which was made unnecessary by the DSF system installation. Up to 80% of the cost of installing PV panels could be recovered as a subsidy. Although PV subsidies are not always supported, some cities provide steady support. The PV subsidy provided by Seoul Metropolitan City provides $1 per watt up to 500 W of installation capacity, and another 60 cents per watt for installation capacity between 500 W and 1,000 W. Apart from this installation capacity, each house receives $45 for installing a PV system [30]. The total capacity of the PV system is 656 W, with 500 W eligible for receiving $1 per W, and the remaining 156 W eligible for receiving 60 cents per W. $594 could be received for the PV capacity and with the $45 subsidy for houses with PV systems, bring the total subsidy to $639. Table 11 shows the amount of initial recovery.The electricity costs saved through the installation of the DSF system, window control, and the amount of electricity generated by the PV system were elements to calculate the amount saved every year. To calculate the cost of electrical energy consumption, it is necessary to know how much electrical energy is used every month. The Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) has different fees for electricity in the summer season and the other seasons, and the charge is differentiated into three types, according to the amount of electrical energy consumed. Table 12 shows the electricity charge table provided by KEPCO which was converted to US dollars for this paper, with the currency exchange rate of 1,200 won per dollar [31].For the life cycle cost analysis, the prices were provided by the actual companies; i.e. the cost of establishing and installing DSF systems such as transportation and lifting. The most plausible subsidy is the PV system installation grant. Considering the reduced electricity bill due to the installation of DSF systems, the payback period is calculated to be 15 years.This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20172010000370). This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20172010000370 ).

FundersFunder number
DSF systems
Strategiske Forskningsråd
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy20172010000370
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
Korea Electric Power Corporation

    Keywords

    • Carbon dioxide emission
    • Double skin façade system
    • Energy savings
    • Life cycle cost analysis
    • Retrofitting

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Energy savings and life cycle cost analysis of advanced double skin facade system applied to old apartments in South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this