Abstract
Increasing the powder layer thickness could increase material deposition rates and reduce build times during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). However, increasing the powder layer thickness could also negatively affect the local melting and subsequent microstructure of the printed material. This study systematically investigated, for the first time, the defect evolution and microstructural changes of LPBF stainless steel 316 (SS316) processed by using various powder layer thicknesses of 40, 80, and 120 μm while also varying the laser dwell time for the pulsed laser. Through image analysis, the pore density was found to increase with increasing powder layer thickness, particularly when the dwell time was too high or too low. The maximum achievable density (>99%) was found over a wide processing window when using the smallest powder layer thickness of 40 μm between dwell times of 60 and 100 μs. Increasing the powder layer thicknesses to 80 and 120 μm resulted in maximum densities of 98.7 and 96.8%, respectively, but the window for acceptable laser dwell times that could achieve these densities narrowed considerably. A microstructural analysis of the melt pools was performed to measure the melt pool depths and widths, both of which increased with increasing dwell time. However, increasing the powder layer thickness did not affect the melt pool depth and only minorly affected the width. A sub-grain cellular structure distinguished the melt pool boundaries. The cell size increased with increasing dwell time and decreasing powder layer thickness. Moreover, the cell size was used to calculate a cooling rate that had a magnitude of 107 K/s and increased with increasing powder layer thickness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 666-674 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Manufacturing Processes |
Volume | 76 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2022 |
Funding
This work was supported by the Transformational Challenge Reactor Program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy. Metallographic preparation was performed by Victoria Cox and Caitlin Duggan. The authors thank Alicia Raftery for assistance with the Renishaw AM400 as well as thank Chase Joslin and Fred List for their advice and feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Transformational Challenge Reactor Program of the U.S. Department of Energy 's Office of Nuclear Energy. Metallographic preparation was performed by Victoria Cox and Caitlin Duggan. The authors thank Alicia Raftery for assistance with the Renishaw AM400 as well as thank Chase Joslin and Fred List for their advice and feedback on the manuscript.
Keywords
- Cellular structure
- Cooling rate
- Laser powder bed fusion
- Melt pool
- Pulsed laser
- Stainless steel