Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dynamic process monitoring and fault detection in a batch fermentation process. comparative performance assessment between MPCA and BDPCA

  • Isaac Monroy
  • , Kris Villez
  • , Moisès Graells
  • , Venkat Venkatasubramanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative study between two multivariate statistical techniques for batch process monitoring and fault diagnosis is presented. Such methods are Multiway Principal Component Analysis (MPCA) and Batch Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (BDPCA) and both are applied for monitoring the penicillin production process. Three faults are used to evaluate the detection performance and the effects of the unfolding arrangement and the pre-processing are tested. Fault diagnosis is covered using Support Vector Machines (SVM) as classification method. The study shows that BDPCA is better than MPCA in terms of diagnosis. Furthermore, monitoring and diagnosis performances seem to improve by dividing the process into batch and fed-batch stages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1371-1375
Number of pages5
JournalComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Financial support from Generalitat de Catalunya through the FI fellowship program is fully appreciated. Financial support received through the research project EHMAN (DPI2009-09386) funded by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund 2007-13) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation is also fully appreciated. The MPCA Matlab code was developed by modelEAU, Université Laval, Québec.

Keywords

  • BDPCA
  • Batch process monitoring
  • Fault detection and diagnosis
  • MPCA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic process monitoring and fault detection in a batch fermentation process. comparative performance assessment between MPCA and BDPCA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this