Dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Report No. 178

Lawrence T. Dauer, André Bouville, Richard E. Toohey, John D. Boice, Harold L. Beck, Keith F. Eckerman, Derek Hagemeyer, Richard W. Leggett, Michael T. Mumma, Bruce Napier, Kathy H. Pryor, Marvin Rosenstein, David A. Schauer, Sami Sherbini, Daniel O. Stram, James L. Thompson, John E. Till, R. Craig Yoder, Cary Zeitlin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Scientific Committee 6–9 was established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), charged to provide guidance in the derivation of organ doses and their uncertainty, and produced a report, NCRP Report No. 178, Deriving Organ Doses and their Uncertainty for Epidemiologic Studies with a focus on the Million Person Study of Low-Dose Radiation Health Effects (MPS). This review summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of NCRP Report No. 178, with a concentration on and overview of the dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the cohorts in the MPS, along with guidelines regarding the essential approaches used to estimate organ doses and their uncertainties (from external and internal sources) within the framework of an epidemiologic study. Conclusions: The success of the MPS is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MPS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. Specific dosimetric reconstruction issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is also a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-609
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Biology
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy [grant numbers: DE-AU0000042 and DE-SC0008944] awarded to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, which included interagency support from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; a grant from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [grant number: NRC-HQ‐60‐14‐G‐0011], grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [grant numbers: 5UE1EH000989 and 5NUE1EH001315], and grants from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [grant numbers: NNX15AU88G and 80NSSC17M0016]. We acknowledge the support provided by the U.S. Department of Defense/Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. We acknowledge the leadership by the Chair of SC 6-9 Andre Bouville, the major support of the NCRP Secretariat, including, Managing Editor Cindy L. O’Brien, Office Manager Laura J. Atwell, and Executive Directors James Cassata (2012–2014), David Smith (2014–2016), and Kathy Held (2016–2018). We express our gratitude to the Council members for the time and effort devoted to the review of NCRP Report No. 178.

Keywords

  • NCRP
  • dosimetry
  • epidemiology
  • radiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Report No. 178'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this