Abstract
We study the magnetic and charge dynamical response of a Hubbard model in a two-leg ladder geometry using the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method and the random phase approximation within the fluctuation-exchange approximation (FLEX). Our calculations reveal that FLEX can capture the main features of the magnetic response from weak up to intermediate Hubbard repulsion for doped ladders, when compared with the numerically exact DMRG results. However, while at weak Hubbard repulsion both the spin and charge spectra can be understood in terms of weakly interacting electron-hole excitations across the Fermi surface, at intermediate coupling DMRG shows gapped spin excitations at large momentum transfer that remain gapless within the FLEX approximation. For the charge response, FLEX can only reproduce the main features of the DMRG spectra at weak coupling and high doping levels, while it shows an incoherent character away from this limit. Overall, our analysis shows that FLEX works surprisingly well for spin excitations at weak and intermediate Hubbard U values even in the difficult low-dimensional geometry such as a two-leg ladder. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for neutron scattering and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering experiments on two-leg ladder cuprate compounds.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 195156 |
Journal | Physical Review B |
Volume | 97 |
Issue number | 19 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 31 2018 |
Funding
A.N., T.M., and E.D. were supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. G.A. and S.J. were supported by the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program funded by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering. N.P. was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No. DMR-1404375 and partially supported by the U.S. DOE, BES, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. Numerical simulations were performed at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility.